Re: [Roll] New proposed charter

This is probably aimed at Pascal but relevant to ROLL. A lot of the text
in draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-00 (esp. section 7) is aimed at
enhancements specific to RPL packet information, so should this work really
be done in ROLL? Or do people think this work is better off done in 6lo as
it is all about compression? There is a clear overlap so perhaps at least
the charter should acknowledge relevant work done in 6lo as well.

Robert

On 11 December 2015 at 15:01, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
wrote:

>
> Dear all:
>
> We propose the following text to replace the current (much longer) charter
> [https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/], please let us know your
> opinion about this.
>
> If you think that other specific topic should be included, please let us
> know as well.
>
> Charter proposed might be:
>
> RFC 6550 was published in 2012, and has seen several successful
> deployments.
>
> Over time, additional issues have come up, including issues in the data
> plane of when to use IPinIP headers, and how to compress them, as well as
> the standardization of a mixed storing/non-storing mechanism.
>
> The WG is chartered to look at enhancements and maintenance to the RPL
> protocol, with the aim of eventually revising and advancing RFC 6550 to
> Internet Standard.
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Michael and Ines.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>