IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] New proposed charter

Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> Tue, 15 December 2015 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <robert.cragie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FEA1A702B for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:45:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H2ivdFf_zShF for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x231.google.com (mail-lb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53CF41A0158 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-x231.google.com with SMTP id lt2so346796lbb.3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:45:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VqLej5pgFv14cVfaGOyG4S2mDZJxkvKNXrqzNiJh7rg=; b=sRCXcFy1kVUtG4zaJl3LRsZ6AzS0VnchbaPEf3YbbxqHssR9Q5cl1eqLV01WsaF+KD jGE9qx33pdxR4pAatDNk/AuJrGcds56N1asrs1bjcIG57G2gi6myA+6oDj3BU39b8bsq iTh4L7hCmM8zsmSCZVnwusiS8aLrMWJLN6KsIRIi5PIg+0eKlnmlKvOIKnCwRnLdVf2g 1DiHFJSBNuPvwFN/zS8a31wKgBBmhWsnG2R57eiro02QvvC33TxtCIWS5g0jupTyD5c/ 3dgNrPLSS3bAd7QYEMdzekhR05s3CqX+D9w3Ck0GRHll10kRj+O3y19ztnRlv6xA9YCy +k1Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.170.67 with SMTP id ak3mr15162428lbc.82.1450165505565; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:45:05 -0800 (PST)
Sender: robert.cragie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.156.75 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:45:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <19959.1450135888@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <CAP+sJUfYLXN7z5b3UtXbs9a_JQjCfBpJGrihQru+k8wTFsOTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADrU+dLC8yAt1n5zRWRHycKkk6HjB4PkJjiuG76=yXc-n4JBcw@mail.gmail.com> <19959.1450135888@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 07:45:05 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aKn-iYKHcyluoTlQs10367-1QT0
Message-ID: <CADrU+dJC=zRbpsswu3N5y2AkvfVAePg2Sv5pS0GtHpjWRKBPQg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c34364d3314d0526eaf78f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/nzECjlRfLSdVvkpnRpGE0CZZxaw>
Cc: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] New proposed charter
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 07:45:09 -0000

OK, that's fine.

Robert

On 14 December 2015 at 23:31, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> wrote:
>     > This is probably aimed at Pascal but relevant to ROLL. A lot of the
>     > text in draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-00 (esp. section 7) is aimed
> at
>     > enhancements specific to RPL packet information, so should this work
>     > really be done in ROLL? Or do people think this work is better off
> done
>     > in 6lo as it is all about compression? There is a clear overlap so
>     > perhaps at least the charter should acknowledge relevant work done in
>     > 6lo as well.
>
> The discussion among ADs was that the requirements would come from ROLL,
> but
> as 6lo is responsible for the IPHC/NHC/etc. that the work needed to occur
> there.
> I anticipate a joint WGLC though.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email