Re: [Roll] New proposed charter

Hi Ines, Michael,

The charter seems to cover my expectations for a continuation of the WG.
Would writing a YANG module for MPL and RPL fit within maintenance?

Peter

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) schreef op 2015-12-11 18:47:
> Hello Ines
> 
> I like the proposal because it is open enough to include the various
> items we discussed recently. Great work!
> 
> I’m in  full support for this proposal as you may have guessed,
> 
> Pascal
> 
> FROM: Roll [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] ON BEHALF OF Ines Robles
> SENT: vendredi 11 décembre 2015 16:01
> TO: roll <roll@ietf.org>
> CC: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> SUBJECT: [Roll] New proposed charter
> 
> Dear all:
> 
> We propose the following text to replace the current (much longer)
> charter [https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/ [1]], please
> let us know your opinion about this.
> 
> If you think that other specific topic should be included, please let
> us know as well.
> 
> Charter proposed might be:
> 
> RFC 6550 was published in 2012, and has seen several successful
> deployments.
> 
> Over time, additional issues have come up, including issues in the
> data plane of when to use IPinIP headers, and how to compress them, as
> well as the standardization of a mixed storing/non-storing mechanism.
> 
> The WG is chartered to look at enhancements and maintenance to the RPL
> protocol, with the aim of eventually revising and advancing RFC 6550
> to Internet Standard.
> 
> Thank you very much,
> 
> Michael and Ines.
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll