IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] New proposed charter

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 11 December 2015 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FE11A8AB6 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:20:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tpyZ_qesDrcp for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:20:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 851631A8AB2 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:20:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060C2E007 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:25:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAF363795 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:20:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <566AF8DE.6070504@fbk.eu>
References: <CAP+sJUfYLXN7z5b3UtXbs9a_JQjCfBpJGrihQru+k8wTFsOTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <566AF8DE.6070504@fbk.eu>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:20:12 -0500
Message-ID: <11115.1449868812@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/48lsAaQ4Fz2W3tXjH8RAw19GMQI>
Subject: Re: [Roll] New proposed charter
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 21:20:15 -0000

Csaba Kiraly <kiraly@fbk.eu> wrote:
    > With Joakim we are working on DAO-ACK semantics and syntax changes,
    > aiming both to clarify DAO-ACK related parts of RFC 6550, as well as to
    > make storing mode operation more reliable and scalable.  The draft is
    > still in its infancy, but the topic might worth adding to the charter.

The intention of the words:

    >     The WG is chartered to look at ***enhancements*** and maintenance to the
    > RPL protocol, with the aim of eventually revising and advancing RFC
    > 6550 to Internet Standard.

Is to be inclusive of items such as you describe, without having to enumerate
them.  If we adopt a document, then it would get a milestone, etc, but we
don't have to go back to the IESG for that.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email