Re: [Roll] New proposed charter

Dear All,

I think  we should not look only into enhancement of RPL but looking into
one new proposed protocol (experimental). My question is why we only have
one standard protocol for ROLL? we may need to look into different/new
scenarios now, so YES we chosen the one routing RPL as a general purpose
protocol for ROLL, now we need to do maintain RPL with its future work, but
we also can now see special cases where we need new protocols for ROLL. We
noticed that ROLL is more a special case of other routing protocols in the
internet but still we didn't go for experimental drafts that cover special
cases and implementations.

AB
University of Tripoli,

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hello Ines
>
>
>
> I like the proposal because it is open enough to include the various items
> we discussed recently. Great work!
>
>
>
> I’m in  full support for this proposal as you may have guessed,
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* Roll [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Ines Robles
> *Sent:* vendredi 11 décembre 2015 16:01
> *To:* roll <roll@ietf.org>
> *Cc:* Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> *Subject:* [Roll] New proposed charter
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear all:
>
>
>
> We propose the following text to replace the current (much longer) charter
> [https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/], please let us know your
> opinion about this.
>
>
>
> If you think that other specific topic should be included, please let us
> know as well.
>
>
>
> Charter proposed might be:
>
>
>
> RFC 6550 was published in 2012, and has seen several successful
> deployments.
>
> Over time, additional issues have come up, including issues in the data
> plane of when to use IPinIP headers, and how to compress them, as well as
> the standardization of a mixed storing/non-storing mechanism.
>
> The WG is chartered to look at enhancements and maintenance to the RPL
> protocol, with the aim of eventually revising and advancing RFC 6550 to
> Internet Standard.
>
>
>
> Thank you very much,
>
>
> Michael and Ines.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>