IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] New proposed charter

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 14 December 2015 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271471A8547 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:31:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rs19Bpgm4N9N for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:31:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A4BE1A86EF for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:31:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D4E203AB; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:37:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E164563797; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:31:28 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com
In-Reply-To: <CADrU+dLC8yAt1n5zRWRHycKkk6HjB4PkJjiuG76=yXc-n4JBcw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUfYLXN7z5b3UtXbs9a_JQjCfBpJGrihQru+k8wTFsOTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADrU+dLC8yAt1n5zRWRHycKkk6HjB4PkJjiuG76=yXc-n4JBcw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:31:28 -0500
Message-ID: <19959.1450135888@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/shIOCVJaZ6_S5C_LsyUVmRQLkx8>
Cc: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] New proposed charter
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:31:32 -0000

Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> wrote:
    > This is probably aimed at Pascal but relevant to ROLL. A lot of the
    > text in draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-00 (esp. section 7) is aimed at
    > enhancements specific to RPL packet information, so should this work
    > really be done in ROLL? Or do people think this work is better off done
    > in 6lo as it is all about compression? There is a clear overlap so
    > perhaps at least the charter should acknowledge relevant work done in
    > 6lo as well.

The discussion among ADs was that the requirements would come from ROLL, but
as 6lo is responsible for the IPHC/NHC/etc. that the work needed to occur
there.
I anticipate a joint WGLC though.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email