Re: [Roll] New proposed charter

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Fri, 18 December 2015 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A6D1B352F for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:03:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rzFJzqmH6ss3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:03:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00B381B352D for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:03:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id yq9so41324219lbb.3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:03:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3888Z2sm1C3rrZbvkK6BMU4uMwdhgV5yIos6HEmSkXg=; b=ZneBvJxKVvl9F5K/3ZX1PJCb+bE962w1+s57GhmEl/mP2rNR1xs2R+SBSlFX3WVpPc jKzsUllrJjUgv46AjtP8Yjcy48kiKqa1wNNalwS5ExmMsRHFDCV0344VuC4Qrfvrv5fo DJQdIBXRineSLV7VOm99ZzEHkz8343xlN/MH/q44zFESbsKTRdEU8Omb25hoOVhiB4Sr nKIN8do1fuHDPGeQJlUGyDKHs+MIWIm5A9kk92lSzeVSy1Ac3WI4zcxpFzboTYG2iBN2 oY11CgUCX7YTWonYToslln3iwznjtrTYgGERqqdpNe4iBX1MfphzSKhm1OXv3FcZITcG tpfA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.11.169 with SMTP id r9mr995869lbb.8.1450432993194; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:03:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.151.143 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:03:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D2987350.F42F2%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <CAP+sJUfYLXN7z5b3UtXbs9a_JQjCfBpJGrihQru+k8wTFsOTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <D2987350.F42F2%aretana@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 07:03:13 -0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUeMFC8bbTh+Qv0B_+oG+NFvz4UBoRPCzwntMJ_rs0526A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3d3165480180527293fac"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/oBLgTuG5W7NDU6nV2Sl2-R_DaAo>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, roll <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] New proposed charter
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:03:17 -0000

Hi,

Agree, thank you very much Alvaro.

Apologizes for late reply, I was in a trip and I am still on a trip and I
dont have permanent access to Internet.

Cheers,

Ines.



2015-12-17 16:17 GMT-03:00 Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com>:

> Hi!
>
> I like the direction of the proposed charter, and the discussion that it
> has generated — and will support it then the time comes.
>
> However, the IESG will want to see clear progress on the currently
> chartered items (use of RPI..) before approving a a new one.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro.
>
> On 12/11/15, 10:01 AM, "Ines Robles" <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Dear all:
>
> We propose the following text to replace the current (much longer) charter
> [https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/], please let us know your
> opinion about this.
>
> If you think that other specific topic should be included, please let us
> know as well.
>
> Charter proposed might be:
>
> RFC 6550 was published in 2012, and has seen several successful
> deployments.
>
> Over time, additional issues have come up, including issues in the data
> plane of when to use IPinIP headers, and how to compress them, as well as
> the standardization of a mixed storing/non-storing mechanism.
>
> The WG is chartered to look at enhancements and maintenance to the RPL
> protocol, with the aim of eventually revising and advancing RFC 6550 to
> Internet Standard.
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Michael and Ines.
>
>