Re: [Roll] New proposed charter

[Randy Turner <[e-mail]>]

I thought the discussion was around developing a new charter. If that's the case then nothing is "in scope" yet. If we're not discussing potential work items for a new charter then what is this thread about again?  I would be happy to work up a draft if that's what is required to get things "in scope"

R.

> On Dec 13, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Randy Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> The additional type of routing I was referring to was similar to this
>> “hybrid”, but specific to multicast. Something like “Non-storing with
>> multicast-storing”
> 
>> This would be basically a non-storing mode of operation, except a node
>> would just store multicast memberships that have been declared - if
>> someone joins a multicast group, you store this…since memberships can
>> be aggregated, it shouldn’t mean too much of a burden on the amount of
>> memory required to store multicast routes.
> 
> Write an ID, slides, etc.. 
> If the IESG approves the proposed charter, it would be in scope.
> (Today, it is not)
> 
> -- 
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works 
> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
>