Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun

Some folks asked me if I plan to resubmit my plan-a document and I am not going to submit it. I think Adam's version is simpler and managed to split the difference between what I was proposing and plan b so I think it is a better choice for the WG than the initial draft I had worked on. 

On May 7, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> In order to facilitate discussion between the two SDP format alternatives we're considering, I've put together a document that more clearly spells out the Plan A approach as we originally envisioned it. Note that this is a slightly different approach than Cullen outlined in Orlando. I fear the Orlando approach may have suffered from its attempts to incorporate some elements of Plan B in an attempt to appease proponents of that approach; and, in doing so, lost some of its clean architecture.
> 
> The cleaned up, new-and-improved description of the Plan A approach is available here:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-roach-rtcweb-plan-a-00.txt
> 
> Note that we've omitted discussion of glare reduction from that document, as I believe that mid-session glare can be completely avoided by applications implementing a set of non-normative behaviors. These behaviors are described in the a separate companion document:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-roach-rtcweb-glareless-add-00.txt
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> /a
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb