IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 08 May 2013 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0504421F93BA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 09:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ahR89QOm9f3I for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 09:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9913421F93B4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 09:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w10so2105351lbi.26 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 May 2013 09:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PuzPaA+dVkyZlktGMcrEJXTLZTC9VN7evA5mel32Ylo=; b=c5oz5uxmy8MNTKHccqsb+nyaM1+kmsrdpm+vhtmE9wJ9+E4KfQx0Fck3qRJtMVCtYy 2tC2BO3y4dnjzuxK5BsKpntGFJ6CldFQRslLU7QzHAan79wNjQshspZielImE7LUOsYq 9LOSexJa2DBXDcCLm5RJwSECYQ3NlZy4hje62WEJdXRoLLDrrs1o8ro1TBPrDfdebdt8 6D8qbLrsWAT1toc+/1cYTNqgTEKpUToZYovdeUJkl2LYTyqm5YQOK2+5C6EEUXmfkapD wmoKmcCmRtdwg3n2QuN8ESaKVVRWLADMLPF33eTzC+IH2jqH7M1QIloP/lklx4N3/GDG c9+Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.159.1 with SMTP id wy1mr3542470lbb.80.1368030388426; Wed, 08 May 2013 09:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.159.138 with HTTP; Wed, 8 May 2013 09:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <518A7994.8040303@jitsi.org>
References: <51894846.3090102@nostrum.com> <518A304A.1030609@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnVvsQMxM1rypF74m45qc8-EYPo4GtC2Cr=32PUz=TPABQ@mail.gmail.com> <518A7588.8060300@jitsi.org> <CABkgnnX+HRHbdPj3uHDRCzJDHedPEE-nBDzyhbWJYrx-mo_Riw@mail.gmail.com> <518A7994.8040303@jitsi.org>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 09:26:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWLQj_b35=cDvwavXbcTeuw5Zw_KKpH6Bfhzrvwn9x4-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 16:26:35 -0000

On 8 May 2013 09:13, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> wrote:
> Well in that case the "won't be able to use lots of streams" part
> doesn't necessarily apply. In the RTP translator case described above
> one could easily have hundreds of SSRCs and hundreds of streams.

Yeah, I wouldn't recommend the use of SDP for signaling that sort of session.

> This would actually be all the more reason not to mandate SSRCs during O/A.

If you plan to a) add lots and lots of streams to the same RTP session
and b) can't know ahead of time what the SSRCs are going to be.  Then
no current SDP proposal is going to work for you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email