Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun

Adam,

I want to check on something:

If I bundle an m-line without a=ssrc, and with unique PTs, do you 
consider it ok if there are multiple "anonymous" flows each complying to 
the attributes of the m-line? Or do you assume that all packets with 
that PT are treated as one flow, switching from one SSRC to another as 
they are received?

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 5/7/13 2:30 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> In order to facilitate discussion between the two SDP format
> alternatives we're considering, I've put together a document that more
> clearly spells out the Plan A approach as we originally envisioned it.
> Note that this is a slightly different approach than Cullen outlined in
> Orlando. I fear the Orlando approach may have suffered from its attempts
> to incorporate some elements of Plan B in an attempt to appease
> proponents of that approach; and, in doing so, lost some of its clean
> architecture.
>
> The cleaned up, new-and-improved description of the Plan A approach is
> available here:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-roach-rtcweb-plan-a-00.txt
>
> Note that we've omitted discussion of glare reduction from that
> document, as I believe that mid-session glare can be completely avoided
> by applications implementing a set of non-normative behaviors. These
> behaviors are described in the a separate companion document:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-roach-rtcweb-glareless-add-00.txt
>
> Thanks.
>
> /a
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>