IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Thu, 16 May 2013 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <emcho@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B550411E8144 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CKmrHQ7PKNBX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com (mail-vc0-f175.google.com [209.85.220.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B112711E8139 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hv10so3014509vcb.34 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Ke26gLsM1clxSGRBmJLf6PsL+wmY0m7KLpfJ3XKRR5w=; b=FdGpwkUue8PG3NpzEn+olqWg8m3tkE5rWH2mWm5FNlYYHa8oxvpadqwQ2hU8QubNLR ZOJWDjAh3lShUTMWr5QisMNLxTGgD4lfX2Ptn+XBe0YjotWq3isy94ucBPl7W97y4Pnj GEo7j2F5A6t3GqhkdN4TMg9XwBL9lzXxNQdLKoHrh2fPWK4uuK5L7RGrI7DGP2MXE4ED Kmx8ZE7jmtzAq4jH7Na7bldb9tjbJ/8qHiCW/Ir/uuXAFq7KrtDsnudpQZ6VC2dgXlAq xjrbUP4itCU5SnMtXitUzn18brUnWW5ZLOjKUTW0z6DVmz9gLkgfo2uUo3P7dPQD7y8n XxcA==
X-Received: by 10.58.106.77 with SMTP id gs13mr7885576veb.22.1368726259539; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f179.google.com (mail-vc0-f179.google.com [209.85.220.179]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u20sm7355712vdt.10.2013.05.16.10.44.18 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 16 May 2013 10:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hz10so445197vcb.10 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.220.168.202 with SMTP id v10mr28169402vcy.71.1368726258683; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.167.197 with HTTP; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <519519DB.6050702@nostrum.com>
References: <51894846.3090102@nostrum.com> <518A304A.1030609@alvestrand.no> <518F6338.8070903@jitsi.org> <518F83E5.4060209@alvestrand.no> <519519DB.6050702@nostrum.com>
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 20:43:58 +0300
Message-ID: <CAPvvaa+ec3BtwE6Q_4KY7SA_3mUNAFCY70J4vNRE27ztMmcmpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmORsHU2hDUiji9Aj4MnvZDw5O+XptQJW2B1kJRetAK0ExmUv/12RGK2NZhjhIIaFv7N4Hl
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:44:40 -0000

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
>
> Your insistence of using "32" rather than "96" is somewhat reminiscent

96? Do you assume no use of rtcp-mux?

Emil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email