IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 17 May 2013 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C64221F9307 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JF62lqumMeB1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A453F21F90EE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id ed20so4471224lab.9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ALXTSGFOvjUsm+jHLtzh6neWrss/ZFteB/dAO6UN5Es=; b=ttbWcdBv0XTkcivRaoeE1SPYJ/6fl6InTVdY6Cflj/Bktk0RvwpN6UrwTnQxV7WFlz GSGNlehTiXdc9Vq8C91SQ8vqaqnk1juCaXDlZz7EjsrEIRap4bqF3sK5l+67kVkikIIF T4qhFXhpVPfD7P69bsSqzUhqaWjLOKhvqAEWULsSDN+vXd87xxcunQLSTMU1vO+c3d+w y1bGpF9Ugx4rpkp/cHYaNf8V1bsA+w/fZVZtS49X9kWz5+WLlc+lQ6ttrx86IFtWfn9h SqXlozIGKOUAEdUtUQjzCSp60enabdrVJI/5yzsfbVuFSNGRcKFok7mlijEiANSC+TlN cuEw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.157.231 with SMTP id wp7mr15125194lbb.91.1368807004327; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.159.138 with HTTP; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5195CEDF.9040109@alvestrand.no>
References: <51894846.3090102@nostrum.com> <518A304A.1030609@alvestrand.no> <518F6338.8070903@jitsi.org> <518F83E5.4060209@alvestrand.no> <519519DB.6050702@nostrum.com> <519524EA.3000509@alvestrand.no> <51952860.5030906@nostrum.com> <5195304B.10706@alvestrand.no> <CABcZeBO+miF-euyyKFDrpMUdnV-Ej2QaZgKmiMc2Yp08QUyz7A@mail.gmail.com> <5195CEDF.9040109@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 09:10:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWbkX-+mLU+o6MfwTB3nyD2weudGg6tOR-U8zXrctm7_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 16:10:06 -0000

On 16 May 2013 23:31, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> The demuxing is trivial. In fact, I don't think it's even necessary to
> describe it as "demux on PT"; you can't allow SSRC collision between two
> tracks with different PT anyway.

Let's be very, very precise about this.

Demultiplexing is *always* performed based on SSRC.  It's just that
correlation with signaling components (the m-line in this case) might
use of PT in the absence of prior knowledge of SSRC.

We didn't get this quite right in Plan A.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email