IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 11 July 2013 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A9821F9DCA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rKEOL8tvf7BX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B4121F99F2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m6so12962433wiv.8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=y4Xl4PqfBprGBeTCyv3Mphwzs4I0+wbcqHC7RveutOk=; b=U/E3hfi9Fdyjb3g6xhx7WcRP3I4KDDRoSjTr+EDvZEWg/B0wY4Z99NZ+9/+MCjD0z2 pN/8gQwNdb4MWpMFuJIcD4OLufTYM5VanYAgh5X9TBvHHRjxwR6sFJ7JhLksTp8aZm2d qpwPdXhBP5aoKJmLM6Yt18QWVWCZAVkD5Js53Fz3hokCa6v4Eq0yEE8B7nthzousF6my MAgkMPmQY9RuCncv3oTQQsqZvulK2XdkgPudYxT92yEEz9YE0BWuy0VVyB9uujLOWTjJ BV9IAv7JQooKG//zEo4w3nQ+qtdLdtg3lDW1ofUTijhQyiVLdZDLBH1rfqF5BfFzhzMG fatA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.77.99 with SMTP id r3mr21912011wjw.5.1373566088838; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBuCTdFsUMtmuBz6BnrSJMpHywEZU+x+m8ARnGprvzDzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBuCTdFsUMtmuBz6BnrSJMpHywEZU+x+m8ARnGprvzDzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:08:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXOa44ZkZj-g6r7Qdk8dwm6m81yT4U=Q23-hE1Q7Hn22w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:08:13 -0000

I can see some implied outcomes for some of the items.  Would it help
to list some (aspirational) goals.

On 11 July 2013 09:51, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> Should SDES be part of  WebRTC security practice and, if so, how?
> Presentations: 30 minutes
> Discussion:  40 minutes

Are the chairs confident that this topic can be resolved in this time?
 We managed to fritter a similar amount of time away without
conclusion in the past.  I can see how you plan to accommodate
overruns, but that just opens the possibility more time-wasting.  How
do we ensure that this discussion actually concludes?

> Post-Plan A/Plan B MMUSIC discussion of impact to RTCWEB documents
> Presentation: 30 minutes

How are you planning to prepare for this?  Do you have presenter
candidates lined up?

> Chair Discussion:  10 minutes

I'm curious how you intend to spend this time.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status