[rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 11 July 2013 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCE221F8E2A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oxi-B7WH228h for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x232.google.com (mail-ie0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10FD21F997B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u16so18010139iet.23 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+6ts8r2f+5OyUnYVTpgfEFv5v4QC3Ap6KOEK7Hi36XE=; b=oXTRFQzUh0GphL6RDws0UpYdiPqHFaLJ2yVWid1ScWDmRjKgBvUBqUR/P6TxfHNvHJ yLdHOJbjbQpkSvCDjEgp2x93T2hF5nnqHTb8hfbc4Khrab3BCtoEMpVvxHykW9ksKAAR qdzACuZfkZ38p+sHMP/sn3pmCs0D3mhcCg76oDuRAZSyY3ql25cEhDku1VoH9/hd+Kmh jK52PkTHITyS3+A7qE8zdVrRUl+bGsK+6llE+n6wriXTgbqMyaOJhSqWT5u5iv9qX4uc XWkE4ud0dTwOMqwyE6YCjkAloK3XyaP7bM7qL9gDOTZme8x9N1SY63lEHn1GoGlV9wVs eKVA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.62.75 with SMTP id w11mr13880528igr.19.1373561466252; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.29.202 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBuCTdFsUMtmuBz6BnrSJMpHywEZU+x+m8ARnGprvzDzA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc10e446205004e13f33ae
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Subject: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:51:30 -0000

Greetings,

Below is an initial draft agenda for the upcoming meeting.   Since we have
not yet reached the draft deadline (which is the 15th), there may be new
drafts or updates that result in changes.  We did already receive requests
for NAT/Firewall traversal discussion, and the chairs will be working with
the document authors to get them considered in the appropriate groups.

As folks have probably noticed, we are meeting Thursday and Friday, after
the MMUSIC sessions are complete (they are Tuesday and Wednesday). This
should allow us to discuss the results on our first day.

Please send feedback or change proposals to the list.

thanks,

Ted and Cullen

Day 1:

Should SDES be part of  WebRTC security practice and, if so, how?
Presentations: 30 minutes
Discussion:  40 minutes

Post-Plan A/Plan B MMUSIC discussion of impact to RTCWEB documents
Presentation: 30 minutes
Discussion: 30 minutes

Security document updates
Presentation: 10 minutes
Discussion: 10 minutes

Day 2:

Chair Discussion:  10 minutes

Use Case Requirements updates:
Issues list presentation: 20 minutes
Discussion: 20 minutes

Data channel:
Issues list presentation:  45 minutes
Discussion: 45 minutes