[rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 11 July 2013 16:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCE221F8E2A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oxi-B7WH228h for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x232.google.com (mail-ie0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10FD21F997B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u16so18010139iet.23 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+6ts8r2f+5OyUnYVTpgfEFv5v4QC3Ap6KOEK7Hi36XE=; b=oXTRFQzUh0GphL6RDws0UpYdiPqHFaLJ2yVWid1ScWDmRjKgBvUBqUR/P6TxfHNvHJ yLdHOJbjbQpkSvCDjEgp2x93T2hF5nnqHTb8hfbc4Khrab3BCtoEMpVvxHykW9ksKAAR qdzACuZfkZ38p+sHMP/sn3pmCs0D3mhcCg76oDuRAZSyY3ql25cEhDku1VoH9/hd+Kmh jK52PkTHITyS3+A7qE8zdVrRUl+bGsK+6llE+n6wriXTgbqMyaOJhSqWT5u5iv9qX4uc XWkE4ud0dTwOMqwyE6YCjkAloK3XyaP7bM7qL9gDOTZme8x9N1SY63lEHn1GoGlV9wVs eKVA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.62.75 with SMTP id w11mr13880528igr.19.1373561466252; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.29.202 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:51:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBuCTdFsUMtmuBz6BnrSJMpHywEZU+x+m8ARnGprvzDzA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bdc10e446205004e13f33ae"
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Subject: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:51:30 -0000
Greetings, Below is an initial draft agenda for the upcoming meeting. Since we have not yet reached the draft deadline (which is the 15th), there may be new drafts or updates that result in changes. We did already receive requests for NAT/Firewall traversal discussion, and the chairs will be working with the document authors to get them considered in the appropriate groups. As folks have probably noticed, we are meeting Thursday and Friday, after the MMUSIC sessions are complete (they are Tuesday and Wednesday). This should allow us to discuss the results on our first day. Please send feedback or change proposals to the list. thanks, Ted and Cullen Day 1: Should SDES be part of WebRTC security practice and, if so, how? Presentations: 30 minutes Discussion: 40 minutes Post-Plan A/Plan B MMUSIC discussion of impact to RTCWEB documents Presentation: 30 minutes Discussion: 30 minutes Security document updates Presentation: 10 minutes Discussion: 10 minutes Day 2: Chair Discussion: 10 minutes Use Case Requirements updates: Issues list presentation: 20 minutes Discussion: 20 minutes Data channel: Issues list presentation: 45 minutes Discussion: 45 minutes
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 - FW Issues Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Hadriel Kaplan
- [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Hrishikesh Kulkarni
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87 Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] A compromise for SDES Cullen Jennings