Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Mon, 15 July 2013 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D3921E8184 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oRqf0HUaqPcJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39EC21E8098 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id ey16so3396660wid.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WifWiOIKHZwUHt/i7E/HDB+2FUOIesB2WqrAUbv44TU=; b=ptN2Bs3HSzuC68SGl7P57od9N96Okb6AR9KJn13VpQpuQbYhVJc9YSxJCHPibaEUsa Sd5pVN/TU3uIRqoqdetJ8wX3oLgq/sN9v7AWdRC/EHZXbt+dYTDSoFHc22OJcmGm16ak grt0yzX0EpJKbSDmSljnSB9u/sqCq+ZuMT237kL7l8c/3FkynBepKuO+h9Svob/uZLPL 0q13NUIdtM+lTJ2vRbF/LbjKZwq75K384JVdReiIQM9/t64jZuWpGiTn0a06n+MzjlTY YoCWXV5xCP0grFbtBJ43FgS+TUUBTGYXSrQdQAOaVGfZNCw6Si51LM00S0sI/9ujE9fZ ZZiw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.212.70 with SMTP id ni6mr6568522wic.11.1373921181817; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.243.34 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBuCTdFsUMtmuBz6BnrSJMpHywEZU+x+m8ARnGprvzDzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBuCTdFsUMtmuBz6BnrSJMpHywEZU+x+m8ARnGprvzDzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:46:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGSS6Zpbo=HdroF+WvHg44c16vHjCqq_mpaRjd3_UaFaWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3505efde2a204e192f327
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:46:24 -0000

Hello Chairs

  I was wondering if we could add "RTCWeb SDP Examples" draft to the Agenda
that shows several SDP examples for the most common WebRTC Use-cases.

The draft location is :
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-sdp-02


Thanks
Suhas

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> Below is an initial draft agenda for the upcoming meeting.   Since we have
> not yet reached the draft deadline (which is the 15th), there may be new
> drafts or updates that result in changes.  We did already receive requests
> for NAT/Firewall traversal discussion, and the chairs will be working with
> the document authors to get them considered in the appropriate groups.
>
> As folks have probably noticed, we are meeting Thursday and Friday, after
> the MMUSIC sessions are complete (they are Tuesday and Wednesday). This
> should allow us to discuss the results on our first day.
>
> Please send feedback or change proposals to the list.
>
> thanks,
>
> Ted and Cullen
>
> Day 1:
>
> Should SDES be part of  WebRTC security practice and, if so, how?
> Presentations: 30 minutes
> Discussion:  40 minutes
>
> Post-Plan A/Plan B MMUSIC discussion of impact to RTCWEB documents
> Presentation: 30 minutes
> Discussion: 30 minutes
>
> Security document updates
> Presentation: 10 minutes
> Discussion: 10 minutes
>
> Day 2:
>
> Chair Discussion:  10 minutes
>
> Use Case Requirements updates:
> Issues list presentation: 20 minutes
> Discussion: 20 minutes
>
> Data channel:
> Issues list presentation:  45 minutes
> Discussion: 45 minutes
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>