IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 26 April 2013 05:19 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF63421F92A5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IAcu6yoDJIPS for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC9D21F921B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E932439E11A; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:19:29 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FBLCLGzVNQqM; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:19:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.10.4.232] (unknown [61.34.168.5]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72D8839E0E1; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:19:28 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <517A0E5C.6010505@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:19:24 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
References: <3FA2E46D-C98E-4FC0-9F1D-AD595A861CE1@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <3FA2E46D-C98E-4FC0-9F1D-AD595A861CE1@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:19:32 -0000

On 04/25/2013 05:57 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> The working groups committed some time ago to have a further discussion on whether SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568 aka SDES) would be usable as a keying method for WebRTC.  As we prepare for that discussion, we'd like to have expressions of interest or support for that approach which indicate the general outlines of support proposed.  If you wish to make such an expression of support, please send it to the chairs or the list.

Sorry, I got lost in the levels of support.

Are you asking for indications of support for the idea of supporting 
SDES (in which case you should also be asking for indications of support 
for the idea of NOT supporting SDES), or are you asking for indications 
of support for the idea of having a discussion about supporting SDES?

             Harald

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email