Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb

Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@orange.com> Fri, 26 April 2013 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <xavier.marjou@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9242921F982D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h+JohYToKHdw for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB4721F981C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id fn20so3401149lab.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9T7gJG4mlyRGXg5qR49N7t8YIoPIWuZCP6Th9Hm+O4U=; b=PrmomHENxlysa/u2QbS3W59YUr4jRiJrQ5udpxnk+jT34o2LO+MPS0Yk7NJk+qTPb2 W5fdxh7/S6TCbZzpFecvAFFY1aF+hzBJkehVFaUyUq0PanWDcfJlDZu+rJl/4JKAEg4d B9PFwoKpb7c7iewBm+2iSyWTaeVyXIXyFEKP8aE/7Bpl9qPVTyryKf4tGWgcm+O0XUX8 xwk/Qt/0ycNiLbVk+NhBMO+XFiDoaJUmJBRsYKVOnySn8jV/xvUsCpNsRftf8m3+gICB w7/8mBLP9PtGGjxQpKtDxXLft5Y1y7YyiSepPY/l68iuAJl5RwBjdLNmhMRHcaDBagKy XJSw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.155.67 with SMTP id vu3mr15093758lbb.109.1366966183836; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: xavier.marjou@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.177.212 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF0E6C04AF@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <3FA2E46D-C98E-4FC0-9F1D-AD595A861CE1@iii.ca> <20130425202238.74EF321F96A5@ietfa.amsl.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48416281FDB@tk5ex14mbxc272.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <03FBA798AC24E3498B74F47FD082A92F3BB8FAF7@US70UWXCHMBA04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF0E6C04AF@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:49:43 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: V_10gmzlJFl5l_pyYoHQE6oEJpM
Message-ID: <CAErhfrx6xi7rNmc6CZc5iyKiYv+oZbi3sBa5QywB7dUKtms2Aw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@orange.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0118306ccec48304db3f9d65"
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:49:46 -0000

+1 for supporting SDES as a keying method for WebRTC

Cheers,

Xavier


On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Hutton, Andrew <
andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com> wrote:

> Also agree that we should support SDES in additional to DTLS-SRTP.
>
> Regards
> Andy
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
> > Sent: 25 April 2013 22:55
> > To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
> >
> > I also agree that we should support SDES in addition to DTLS-SRTP.
> >
> > This raises a further question about SCTP/DTLS for DataChannels.  It
> > seems that if we support SDES-SRTP, don't we also need to provide an
> > SDES keying mechanism for DataChannels?  Ekr: What is needed to realize
> > this?
> >
> > Richard Ejzak
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:28 PM
> > > To: Bogineni, Kalyani; 'Cullen Jennings'; rtcweb@ietf.org
> > > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
> > >
> > > I agree. The ability to set the cipher suite and keys from JavaScript
> > > is critical for certain applications. SDES is the best we'll get with
> > > SDP as the API. DTLS-SRTP-only would be unacceptably limiting.
> > >
> > > Matthew Kaufman
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > > > Behalf Of Bogineni, Kalyani
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 1:21 PM
> > > > To: 'Cullen Jennings'; rtcweb@ietf.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and
> > RTCWeb
> > > >
> > > > We would like to support the use of SDES as a keying method for
> > > WebRTC.
> > > >
> > > > Kalyani Bogineni
> > > > Verizon
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > > > Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:57 AM
> > > > To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> > > > Subject: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The working groups committed some time ago to have a further
> > > > discussion on whether SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568 aka SDES)
> > > > would be usable as a keying method for WebRTC.  As we prepare for
> > > that
> > > > discussion, we'd like to have expressions of interest or support
> > for
> > > > that approach which indicate the general outlines of support
> > > proposed.
> > > > If you wish to make such an expression of support, please send it
> > to
> > > the chairs or the list.
> > > >
> > > > Cullen, Magnus, & Ted <The Chairs>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rtcweb mailing list
> > > > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rtcweb mailing list
> > > > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rtcweb mailing list
> > > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>