Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 25 April 2013 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EE221F973B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UfjuxeYLM+Oe for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D9921F9738 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id l13so106900wie.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KE6qTBW1st1UIe+Rgbl0/6kSBVJPt0IZ//nZWUdZHVQ=; b=WcON7QEKaEeZncjmnU3WkxepW7Qqkpm8R7OpW47EL3ylsqwYkZm1xO19AEpDKNrO2L RE9nAhuW7MdJKEmhlGDMWcxcDnnc584+Iu1+dG8nijrtjWLSBZId+64jPpPjc1szmSfd lpNAxZuUhTYQGoRrHu6eqvYVZ16qUdtJYd8KT1iw0tG9hxVT+YXP1ytDlXHRGvOmyXgO WCSWkgxAyZggHoF3OW9sKkk8Tf4YsWIO5jo6hJ2BM+OnT9DjawEFS//Ig8fHI/75I9Pn 0AEQ1KU5wp2Y6JHVdJQ0TP0VNkeL6rY87NQ9bKs6mztCk5936MO3A5NQk3gGatuFPDDy bS5g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.198.49 with SMTP id iz17mr659186wic.19.1366933247820; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.33.102 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5179BD66.6000303@jesup.org>
References: <3FA2E46D-C98E-4FC0-9F1D-AD595A861CE1@iii.ca> <CABkgnnVky++ZF1uaM8p4xtzvDQH7HMCaL8N2ZV3dZDYnv-NvzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOkCC9wn7H7a4U0SYNAfYtNB2w6SvwZi4aL5f9wcwLp+g@mail.gmail.com> <5179BD66.6000303@jesup.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:40:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVXz9012YhFn73g+=L9hst1O4M0-ykWO1BvZHbJ3yiOyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:40:49 -0000

On 25 April 2013 16:33, Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org> wrote:
> SDES is basically "protect against WiFi sniffers" encryption.

I wondered when this characterization would resurface.  It's a really
bad one.  SDES protects your communications from everyone except the
website and anyone they choose to send it to.  It's no different to
using DTLS-SRTP to send data directly to a server that presents the
sites domain certificate.  It's exactly equivalent to allowing
getUserMedia with peerIdentity constraint (and that other one I can't
ever remember the name of).

Whether this is acceptable depends on your threat model.