IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 30 April 2013 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897F521F9766 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.317
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.317 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.360, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pzy2OL5QcBjh for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-f41.google.com (mail-qe0-f41.google.com [209.85.128.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5C421F9851 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b10so392835qen.14 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=cVt5sfGow3dpiMIRvYPuYLeI36FUva7/61r0sHyUerQ=; b=AJbSijLqfs0aTWnowZztZqmFeFJL6AQtSjX9eCAhqdjnXIoQENs5mJtI3LgmOy74BB P7+szQcD/pZvyMUQT6bEpQORxsGRBiD/X3GCiPR4xON8DMHS4xTUDZ5gy0jUNwR896ts 6QA3rkmsVZbvNy9rnESv73GetBqMaRrd09MVrm9qE1dWFSM3XHtydtXRVdfI4n7qnduT wCSDuaF5SKYtNeNbNQdZBI2fbFxCayiExNf9WOzag/vtLi+rZy+TLVqSy80ab4UmGK/I xqII4d6ms67eSs7Syzai3NT7GUAM0wHQ1cVxnGRNf3pNLMqL/nfybVfR/e9HnsFHJLO6 6YmA==
X-Received: by 10.49.74.226 with SMTP id x2mr67689050qev.63.1367338171689; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.81.175 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9F765AE3-A724-4F46-905F-C024954920E5@cisco.com>
References: <3FA2E46D-C98E-4FC0-9F1D-AD595A861CE1@iii.ca> <517E0322.2060303@oracle.com> <53B9C161-C492-4F07-A9BD-75E17AE79AC9@phonefromhere.com> <CALiegfmg2365P7rKshdH4vrvh685WSXg6WTK6h+pkg=HRHS8_A@mail.gmail.com> <5F38A528-70D7-414D-8462-BE3591EA26C1@cisco.com> <CALiegfmTxLgBBpj9Uo-nQ4Qk4Nxjw8r2it9O0jtf2i_B0tUtKg@mail.gmail.com> <9F765AE3-A724-4F46-905F-C024954920E5@cisco.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:09:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegf=s3K6DkSD4WoR-dHvuM4jckfxM8XBDAWH_uAPod_z0_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkGhQC8v1OhdliBTkL5d/whM5AJVVnwHyhubow1ncj8SgVWht8fPVATbBU2d9r0WQhxg5KW
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP Security Descriptions (RFC 4568) and RTCWeb
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:09:39 -0000

2013/4/30 Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>:
> Webrtc has already made decisions that make a pure proxy unfeasible with most legacy SIP networks:  ICE-Lite, RTP/RTCP multiplexing on the same port, and bundling.

ICE / rtcp-mux / bundle does not require sending a reINVITE by an
intermediary signaling server *at all*, but just a media gateway.


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email