Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot

[Rob Glidden <[e-mail]>]

Sure it is, there's an open MPEG meeting resolution on the MPEG VP8 
proposal to that effect, apparently even National Body comment.

Rob

On 3/13/2013 9:36 PM, Wang, Ye-Kui wrote:
> Sure - but that is clearly not the context here.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 13, 2013, at 17:24, "Gerard Fernando" <[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>> Hello YK,
>>
>> The disclosure process in MPEG is not based on who you are, or on 
>> your Business model.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Gerard
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* "Wang, Ye-Kui" <[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> *To:* Stockhammer Thomas <[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>; Bo Burman <[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> *Cc:* "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 13 March 2013, 10:40
>> *Subject:* Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
>>
>> > >  How many others who did not respond to MPEG LA's call but have IPR
>> > > are
>> > there?
>> >
>> > [TS]  Just one more hypothesis: If I would have, what would be my
>> > obligation/motivation to do so now?
>>
>> Speaking of the motivation part; that would depend on who YOU are and 
>> what kind of business model or plan YOU have in mind.
>>
>> BR, YK
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> 
>> [mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>] On 
>> Behalf
>> > Of Stockhammer Thomas
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 7:53 AM
>> > To: Bo Burman
>> > Cc: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
>> >
>> >
>> > >  How many others who did not respond to MPEG LA's call but have 
>> IPR are
>> > there?
>> >
>> > [TS]  Just one more hypothesis: If I would have, what would be my
>> > obligation/motivation to do so now?
>> >
>> > >>>
>> > >>> We appreciate the need to have time to evaluate the specific words
>> > >>> of the license statements that are forthcoming, and the need 
>> for the
>> > >>> people who haven't made their IPR declarations over the last couple
>> > >>> of years of discussion to do so within the next couple of weeks -
>> > >>> but we do think that it is important to use the face to face time
>> > >>> that we have here in Orlando to lay to rest any *other* issues than
>> > >>> the licensing terms and other issues derived from Google's
>> > announcement.
>> > >>
>> > >> I am not sure we can have a reasoned consideration of 'other issues
>> > derived'
>> > >> at such short notice.
>> > >>
>> > >> Look, I'd like our discussions and decisions to be informed and
>> > >> considered, and there simply isn't time for either.
>> > >>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Harald
>> > >>>
>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>> > >>> rtcweb mailing list
>> > >>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> > >>
>> > >> David Singer
>> > >> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> rtcweb mailing list
>> > >> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Dr. Thomas Stockhammer (CEO) || [e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]> || phone +49
>> > 89 978980 02 || cell [phone] || http://www.nomor-research.com 
>> <http://www.nomor-research.com/>
>> > Nomor Research GmbH  -  Sitz der Gesellschaft: München - 
>> Registergericht:
>> > München, HRB 165856 - Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE238047637 - Geschäftsführer:
>> > Dr. Thomas Stockhammer, Dr. Ingo Viering.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rtcweb mailing list
>> > [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb