Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 12 March 2013 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC7B11E810D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yGMNT4iz4AUt for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D6921F8A48 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id bn7so325953ieb.25 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wKiwjflIiz/cuytjrO8hJ7xvWhwVjij9TGG4LCCjuxY=; b=EV2yjm/gWsTey2g4UyJ+UxN3Uyhl3rU1046JZ0wVWVrgZ1TkkksnObUfwuyu6YiYEe gLVjLaZMJZJZa499SC/k/hKuwRYpKCIPYE6sXleyA9RQ5MZr5ysdMR/t3/ItSIFQvC0j 3pUeRMvUdas0LgASVHzlWn3jAS/VfUqlJtXqWATPWtxtej3js39S/0m0fHcf9mVHu4mP tETtP+6ZVa9xTJE3aiGdsYeJ9QNnmBVeOkn/YpSXGJXCw/Wmo36Vh1Ol05dLyTc4dugn 1jIR0WACld7CE41ie3jq0vlnT6UXjtMD9xdEP+vwBhCOs40qW5n9N5eR1CIqgaSP8xRW 2bJA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.36.169 with SMTP id r9mr12955998igj.96.1363117167365; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.135.202 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1BF51E01-AE8A-4DCF-82B9-7C8AE95A3C6E@apple.com>
References: <513F68C0.4010106@ericsson.com> <DD34B1B0-2C18-4081-81CC-584192CC726C@apple.com> <CA+9kkMChmdyzeRgfNPK4oDhZHhj0BDXptPnrx-c+RRmEP=K=+g@mail.gmail.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AA2653BC5E@XMB106BCNC.rim.net> <CA+9kkMArtaw1=1H3cHcVaFhaFCCfjy7Tzwc1EDJ2vZc6UOhL=g@mail.gmail.com> <1BF51E01-AE8A-4DCF-82B9-7C8AE95A3C6E@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:39:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMD94qFxjBK45sMj3cm+23hnGa50MUKd9YomZ5mt9R+6Nw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:39:33 -0000

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:33 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
>

> * The decision rests on (at least) late-breaking news, and
>unavailable information, and I am opposed to any move to get a >formal decision for a mandatory video codec at the meeting.
>
>

Hi David, Gaelle,

I am glad that we all agree that the technical discussion is needed
and can go forward.

On the IPR issue, my understanding is that Robert will call for a
sense of the room on who believes that they have enough data now to
make decision and, if not, what exactly is needed.  That will occur
*before* any discussion on which will be chosen.  I am confident he is
aware of the discussion on the list to date from those who are already
indicating their preferences to wait for more information, but I have
cc'ed him explicitly on this message so he can confirm.

As noted before, none of the chairs will be making the calls related
to the codec question.

regards,

Ted Hardie