Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
"Wang, Ye-Kui" <yekuiw@qti.qualcomm.com> Wed, 13 March 2013 17:40 UTC
Return-Path: <yekuiw@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D4421F8D98 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.309
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.309 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.291, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lwydx2gnBsNz for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454F821F8D66 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1363196401; x=1394732401; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=bjcYH7E66hFspy5DxDS5Iu9F/24PClD8Y0ErNCwbHjk=; b=N3KHd84ymwNrFa5s63BebcEfuTjbNTPod9bEiJ8Nzda9u/SrkMbyv5Fg 4l/H7NZ3f5Q9hPC3FvWMl817IV2iFx9ipop29JXam0o4Onfy9OWxF8n8t jTYybz/WfzGO6L81UnT7Md/LWWWYtYbafInftx8LGIBB0gaMj7YhzECCa 0=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,838,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="29810898"
Received: from ironmsg01-lv.qualcomm.com ([10.47.202.180]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2013 10:40:00 -0700
Received: from nasanexhc14.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.23]) by ironmsg01-lv.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 13 Mar 2013 10:40:00 -0700
Received: from NASANEXD02F.na.qualcomm.com ([169.254.8.64]) by nasanexhc14.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.23]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:40:00 -0700
From: "Wang, Ye-Kui" <yekuiw@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Stockhammer Thomas <stockhammer@nomor.de>, Bo Burman <bo.burman@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
Thread-Index: AQHOH0jr3vjUB09c8EG4MhtYHbfvE5ii0RyAgAAIloCAAAHrgIABTYKAgAACnQD//7k88A==
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:40:00 +0000
Message-ID: <8BA7D4CEACFFE04BA2D902BF11719A8331B17F22@nasanexd02f.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <513F68C0.4010106@ericsson.com> <DD34B1B0-2C18-4081-81CC-584192CC726C@apple.com> <513F7745.3020302@alvestrand.no> <CBC4C75B-0397-4953-8C06-4E236DA15250@apple.com> <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22DE30E9C@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> <AEDB506D-E350-4E14-B8ED-F2D07C16D57A@nomor.de>
In-Reply-To: <AEDB506D-E350-4E14-B8ED-F2D07C16D57A@nomor.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [199.106.115.132]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:40:03 -0000
> > How many others who did not respond to MPEG LA's call but have IPR > > are > there? > > [TS] Just one more hypothesis: If I would have, what would be my > obligation/motivation to do so now? Speaking of the motivation part; that would depend on who YOU are and what kind of business model or plan YOU have in mind. BR, YK > -----Original Message----- > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Stockhammer Thomas > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 7:53 AM > To: Bo Burman > Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot > > > > How many others who did not respond to MPEG LA's call but have IPR are > there? > > [TS] Just one more hypothesis: If I would have, what would be my > obligation/motivation to do so now? > > >>> > >>> We appreciate the need to have time to evaluate the specific words > >>> of the license statements that are forthcoming, and the need for the > >>> people who haven't made their IPR declarations over the last couple > >>> of years of discussion to do so within the next couple of weeks - > >>> but we do think that it is important to use the face to face time > >>> that we have here in Orlando to lay to rest any *other* issues than > >>> the licensing terms and other issues derived from Google's > announcement. > >> > >> I am not sure we can have a reasoned consideration of 'other issues > derived' > >> at such short notice. > >> > >> Look, I'd like our discussions and decisions to be informed and > >> considered, and there simply isn't time for either. > >> > >>> > >>> Harald > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> rtcweb mailing list > >>> rtcweb@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > >> > >> David Singer > >> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> rtcweb mailing list > >> rtcweb@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > > > --- > Dr. Thomas Stockhammer (CEO) || stockhammer@nomor.de || phone +49 > 89 978980 02 || cell +491725702667 || http://www.nomor-research.com > Nomor Research GmbH - Sitz der Gesellschaft: München - Registergericht: > München, HRB 165856 - Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE238047637 - Geschäftsführer: > Dr. Thomas Stockhammer, Dr. Ingo Viering. > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agend… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Gaelle Martin-Cocher
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Gaelle Martin-Cocher
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Coban, Muhammed
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Robert Sparks
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Gaelle Martin-Cocher
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Stockhammer Thomas
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Wang, Ye-Kui
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Gerard Fernando
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Wang, Ye-Kui
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Rob Glidden
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Wang, Ye-Kui
- Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday a… Rob Glidden