Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com> Tue, 12 March 2013 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950A411E80A3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lm5rkZ68Lgfu for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx2.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EEA21F8793 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.33.240] (dhcp-21f0.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.33.240]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx2.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A85FF22D9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <513F76ED.4090201@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:41:49 -0700
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120625 SeaMonkey/2.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <513F68C0.4010106@ericsson.com> <DD34B1B0-2C18-4081-81CC-584192CC726C@apple.com> <513F734E.5010803@matthew.at>
In-Reply-To: <513F734E.5010803@matthew.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec discussion in Thursday agenda slot
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:41:51 -0000

Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> The chairs now have requests from at least three participants to
> entirely defer the presentation and discussion. I cannot see how this
> could possibly have less weight than the single request received the
> very morning of the meeting last time.

As I recall that morning, there was a hum in the room over whether or 
not to postpone, and the result was overwhelming. If it had not been, 
the result might have been very different.