IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] Proposed Unified Address Mapping for encapsulation and double-translation

xiaohong deng <dxhbupt@gmail.com> Mon, 10 October 2011 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dxhbupt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC3B21F85F2 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 23:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oWvTO8g07i8C for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 23:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2737821F85F7 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 23:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so2862882wyg.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 23:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MLl4c7hDWGuLN3C+fvcvD9gaxqCNtYKJQE9tYqBcQ28=; b=DJgI6I5WWfVaiqyb6ECnZXZZ+pIaXjYCY09H4R1wkvFZkVK1RA9B8mGC4+/1+4Vydj QhK0b3iDp5hOMk/Qc/P1WnBWxc0uRrGzc6SW3TOngxlL5jTpvQt9OZWmRNkCYqrw98ih HSLsPl5Rmo0P4GUlk5aEO5hY/FJRqo4SaAuiI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.176.70 with SMTP id bd6mr405976wbb.3.1318226523249; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 23:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.104.202 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 23:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:02:03 +0800
Message-ID: <CANb4Ock6gmucbc5vAj-08sq3UGz=JL9s3wm_fGnu2S+fGPTpLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: xiaohong deng <dxhbupt@gmail.com>
To: jacni@jacni.com, phdgang@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Proposed Unified Address Mapping for encapsulation and double-translation
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 06:02:04 -0000

>
> ISPs' cases are quite different, while the philosophy of address
> planning is not, and should be kept in mind when we design the MAP.

Agreed.

Cheers,
Xiaohong

>
>
> Cheers,
> Jacni
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email