Re: [Softwires] Proposed Unified Address Mapping for encapsulation and double-translation

Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com> Thu, 06 October 2011 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ot@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6564F21F87C5 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.430, BAYES_00=-2.599, DC_IMAGE_SPAM_HTML=0.001, DC_IMAGE_SPAM_TEXT=0.001, DC_PNG_UNO_LARGO=0.558, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6b2S5ZmhejSE for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com (ams-iport-4.cisco.com [144.254.224.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5AC21F8C15 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ot@cisco.com; l=235532; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1317934800; x=1319144400; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to; bh=Xb0hAItZSxrBOPXaiouG+QVAiY3rkzMOXU2GNxaf8H4=; b=SsFpbDwcEPLmw+WvrRhKfQjHloidB/8Eq0A6C0lgiTXTOUktYxvt1xjw fZGt1NfLMVS4U4ERZR6Fn3outPJjTbvQf7I9cZX+dl2lOaSvm3YEO+mSL CWABe0aa9zOo1s76wKIa6XwBxbCYvHDSAYD2ZUpfmFq8A1udxhAjr8FIe 4=;
X-Files: Screen shot 2011-10-06 at 16.56.12 .png : 171392
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAMYVjk6Q/khN/2dsb2JhbABCqDOBBYFTAQEBAwEFAQwBZhALHQEBJwIVAT8GNYdcmlYBngWGS2EEjlGFHZFi
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.68,498,1312156800"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,150"; a="480348"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Oct 2011 20:59:59 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-55-90-44.cisco.com (dhcp-10-55-90-44.cisco.com [10.55.90.44]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p96Kxv0l009537; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 20:59:57 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail-15-325180960"
From: Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0CA7D5CF-BFE5-46FB-8948-9A51494CB8B0@laposte.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:59:57 -0400
Message-Id: <FCD9A724-9BA0-470D-BEBF-2799E6D643E4@cisco.com>
References: <F259BF79-B3C9-4434-AAC4-9F84B8D9A0FA@laposte.net> <16C872EF-F79E-4FD8-89B9-21B50129BA70@employees.org> <2118E521-F0CC-46F3-9F63-0EC6893326C6@laposte.net> <A6E71822-0DC5-49D6-B113-30701B623FE6@employees.org> <0CA7D5CF-BFE5-46FB-8948-9A51494CB8B0@laposte.net>
To: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:59:29 -0700
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Proposed Unified Address Mapping for encapsulation and double-translation
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:56:53 -0000

Remi,

>>> May I suggest that, to be more constructive, you could first express your objections to the proposed unified mapping, rather than making a number of new proposals whose justifications are sometimes hard to understand, 
>> 
>> I'd rather that we agree on the requirements.
>> my questions were against what requirements you based parts of your proposal on. are these new/different requirements from those I showed on the slide in Beijing?
> 
> Please send a copy of the slide you are referring to.

certainly.

cheers,
Ole