IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] Proposed Unified Address Mapping for encapsulation and double-translation

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 06 October 2011 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ichiroumakino@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F5921F8DF7 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h9U2dxBLxxBB for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB7021F8DE9 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyh21 with SMTP id 21so3459360wyh.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=VIoTUXEyxT4c+OdqWlvLfIhPmWXcq4nsu0Allj6EwEs=; b=dqKZ0aTHiu21etipD9+XfVjV2gEHYJdGkj59TzZB81ps/YCs9slvYp7+OyRPu0Sbwt 5AOH2kIZBckCwLDqlz8VHk9EI0oMNy1uuSKG5L21d9pgWjrjUDfCUOcgaIVP9ZqcgaEl fDQEL2HUlTRbBzhyRHE3EtbqUUs0MLJbXJPL0=
Received: by 10.216.132.210 with SMTP id o60mr1311022wei.92.1317917591112; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-10-55-90-44.cisco.com (64-103-25-233.cisco.com. [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h14sm11013114wbo.7.2011.10.06.09.13.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Ole Troan <ichiroumakino@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <2118E521-F0CC-46F3-9F63-0EC6893326C6@laposte.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:13:06 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A6E71822-0DC5-49D6-B113-30701B623FE6@employees.org>
References: <F259BF79-B3C9-4434-AAC4-9F84B8D9A0FA@laposte.net> <16C872EF-F79E-4FD8-89B9-21B50129BA70@employees.org> <2118E521-F0CC-46F3-9F63-0EC6893326C6@laposte.net>
To: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Proposed Unified Address Mapping for encapsulation and double-translation
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:10:13 -0000

Remi,

> May I suggest that, to be more constructive, you could first express your objections to the proposed unified mapping, rather than making a number of new proposals whose justifications are sometimes hard to understand, 

I'd rather that we agree on the requirements.
my questions were against what requirements you based parts of your proposal on. are these new/different requirements from those I showed on the slide in Beijing?

cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email