Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review

[Andrew Sullivan <[e-mail]>]

Hi Doug,

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:32:39PM -0800, Douglas Otis wrote:

> Perhaps express this as requirement to establish a realistic
> Security Consideration section.

If we're going to do that, we ought to list all the other standard
things that published WG documents are supposed to do, like reflect WG
consensus, have correct boilerplate, have correct references --
indeed, the charter would end up having all the PROTO instructions,
the instructions to genart and secdir, and so on.

And, indeed, every charter ought to contain this.

I think it's an unreasonable request.

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
[e-mail]