IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Thu, 02 February 2012 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989E721F8527 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:12:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.297, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q3ex01qGFy4U for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:12:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E827D21F851A for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:12:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id 3CC6333C27; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:12:34 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:12:34 -0500
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120202151234.GD46701@verdi>
References: <4F28DBB7.5070101@qualcomm.com> <4F29E395.3020100@mail-abuse.org> <5905d04c-42eb-42f0-b580-1fb654cfe5af@email.android.com> <4F2A11E7.10409@mail-abuse.org> <CAC4RtVDPHDN6jfJ8xPPDQjfYuQHwuOvAoa4JiyfrKz5HwkURYg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVDPHDN6jfJ8xPPDQjfYuQHwuOvAoa4JiyfrKz5HwkURYg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:12:36 -0000

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
> Regardless of what we put in the charter, reviewing the security
> considerations and considering revising them appropriately is clearly
> an in-scope -- I might even say *required* -- activity.  It will be
> up to the chairs to ensure that happens and to manage the discussion.
> It will be one responsibility of the participants to come to consensus
> on it, and to accept when the consensus is against them, and move on.

   I was thinking of posting the same thing: there's no reason to put
a Security Considerations item in the charter.

   FYI, this charter is on today's IESG agenda. Hopefully Pete will
advise us of any action taken.

   (Barry will be trying on his brand-new-AD hat in about an hour. :^)

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email