IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review

Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Wed, 01 February 2012 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E30B11E80C2 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:49:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UtJam5As+c5R for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FB911E80B2 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.26] (mail.pir.org [72.44.190.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q11FmvRj020055 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:49:04 -0800
Message-ID: <4F295EE5.1000502@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:48:53 -0500
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
References: <4F28DBB7.5070101@qualcomm.com> <4F292787.5040109@dcrocker.net> <4F295CA2.7030902@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F295CA2.7030902@qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:49:05 -0000

On 2/1/2012 10:39 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
> My read of the line has always been that there is a burden on the proposer to
> show that any particular enhancement already has implementation and that the
> community has already (past tense) given the feature widespread support. I am
> willing to leave to the judgment of the chairs (and myself) whether the WG has
> clear consensus on the "widespread support" of such an enhancement should one
> come forward.


mumble(*)

d/


(*) that's a synonym for 'grumble'.

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email