IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Wed, 01 February 2012 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4542B11E80B2 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:39:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gs9Cf9dzanms for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:39:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8422711E8071 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:39:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1328110765; x=1359646765; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4F295CA2.7030902@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20We d,=201=20Feb=202012=2009:39:14=20-0600|From:=20Pete=20Res nick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20<dcrocker@bbiw.net>|CC:=20Dave =20CROCKER=20<dhc2@dcrocker.net>,=20<spfbis@ietf.org> |Subject:=20Re:=20[spfbis]=20Updated=20charter=20-=20fina l=20review|References:=20<4F28DBB7.5070101@qualcomm.com> =20<4F292787.5040109@dcrocker.net>|In-Reply-To:=20<4F2927 87.5040109@dcrocker.net>|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20 charset=3D"ISO-8859-1"=3B=20format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|X-Originating-IP:=20[1 72.30.48.1]; bh=sf4sK3TxbZTv+KcMBBXVCGD9Mvv7u9geaZkxkmoozaM=; b=Z/X/r0t4rk1VU7QtLLFk9yCBGcQy0GLSAx1rAw5EvhZWIBmzmOOC96Uq 9Mc7RJQzTRdadUAtsid6nHWV4+WshNop/X9Ui415hFquVSgSIpWst9cJ2 WzzJB54VMhWX8t0ag65LatA4ynWmoLjFbkaZD/nn2xQxPx1ZBLhvtPr0N I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6606"; a="159659916"
Received: from ironmsg04-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.19]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2012 07:39:21 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,602,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="158014893"
Received: from nasanexhc04.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.17]) by Ironmsg04-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 01 Feb 2012 07:39:20 -0800
Received: from Macintosh-4.local (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.1; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:39:16 -0800
Message-ID: <4F295CA2.7030902@qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:39:14 -0600
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <4F28DBB7.5070101@qualcomm.com> <4F292787.5040109@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F292787.5040109@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:39:26 -0000

On 2/1/12 5:52 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> On 2/1/2012 1:29 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> addition of any enhancements
>>      that have already gained widespread support,
>
> What additions are being proposed and considered?
>
> This clause broadens the scope significantly.

This line has been in the charter since it went to the IESG and for IETF 
review.

My read of the line has always been that there is a burden on the 
proposer to show that any particular enhancement already has 
implementation and that the community has already (past tense) given the 
feature widespread support. I am willing to leave to the judgment of the 
chairs (and myself) whether the WG has clear consensus on the 
"widespread support" of such an enhancement should one come forward.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email