IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review

Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Fri, 03 February 2012 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A25521F8528 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:40:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.193
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.193 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ArU+G-Kemh+f for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:40:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F9921F8526 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:40:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.22.16.112] ([68.65.169.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q13HeGtI023971 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:40:21 -0800
Message-ID: <4F2ACD02.40700@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:50:58 -0500
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <4F28DBB7.5070101@qualcomm.com> <4F29E395.3020100@mail-abuse.org> <5905d04c-42eb-42f0-b580-1fb654cfe5af@email.android.com> <4F2A11E7.10409@mail-abuse.org> <CAC4RtVDPHDN6jfJ8xPPDQjfYuQHwuOvAoa4JiyfrKz5HwkURYg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVDPHDN6jfJ8xPPDQjfYuQHwuOvAoa4JiyfrKz5HwkURYg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:40:22 -0800 (PST)
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:40:27 -0000

On 2/2/2012 9:18 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>  > Perhaps express this as requirement to establish a realistic Security
> Consideration section.
>
> Regardless of what we put in the charter, reviewing the security considerations
> and considering revising them appropriately is clearly an in-scope -- I might
> even say *required* -- activity.


Still, it might be worth adding the suggested extra text to the charter. 
Personally, I was planning on trying to establish an UNrealistic Security 
Considerations section, but would not pursue it if the charter prohibited it...

Perhaps the charter should also contain a proscription against meaningless 
charter content?

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email