IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law (was: Question about SRv6 Insert function)

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Fri, 06 September 2019 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6960120DF4; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 14:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bsuoL8Nm8prr; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 14:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D33E8120DEE; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 14:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D3B4B; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 23:58:03 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date:date :in-reply-to:x-mailer:from:from:subject:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=mail; t= 1567807080; bh=IMoBqkgvfnNzaJV2plJwEGuy0cBcrpqfutl3JPiibbY=; b=G YwaJyMilyCup/Zl92wTIIarzhX7bqF39Z35ujkNFng6kMnZffPayEysdaKB4PqCz ygU9odzyQBHVRVYzr47dJNe+7tNK9RNKsEiHHywsdRRHO8N2z2lBQmHeb7D7Z3+J /ccaRR1vJMLz/8tTVJKvHCbiBbSmJ8bJr9qPmPsZcM=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id eWW9lxyFgrth; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 23:58:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:30d9:a3ba:cef:60ff] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:30d9:a3ba:cef:60ff]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A883C3C; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 23:58:00 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G77)
In-Reply-To: <F92186CF-B93A-44F9-83B5-272963A9B9FD@employees.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:57:59 +0200
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EDB1ACFD-3924-4599-B95D-D1FC6FF2425A@steffann.nl>
References: <4053BBF5-4678-4E13-88E6-553627E4D32A@steffann.nl> <F92186CF-B93A-44F9-83B5-272963A9B9FD@employees.org>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Uj1M2iFdaO4rsMZMtxM9UZIUKuA>
Subject: Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law (was: Question about SRv6 Insert function)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 21:58:08 -0000

Hi Ole,

> I don’t see a need to continue this debate on meta issues, but since you framed this as criticism of me in the chair role I found it required to reply. 

I expect the chair to uphold a previously reached consensus and put the requirement of justifying deviating from it with the ones that want to go against said consensus.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email