Re: [tcpm] Increasing the Initial Window - Notes

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Thu, 11 November 2010 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A0D3A68C6 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:44:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Hid8SKa07kK for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:44:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-sa01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.47]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE063A689C for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:44:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-sa01.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id oABAiuA4019408 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:44:56 +0200
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <29E76BE6-32D9-45AD-85A1-791DAADDE520@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:44:48 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <73BF99B9-B55E-41AA-951D-E6B902160632@nokia.com>
References: <20101110152857.GA5094@hell> <AANLkTi=RzbPbVRDQh7y-ydY-P7H16wDri=8EtXP5QuV3@mail.gmail.com> <20101111012453.GB2691@hell> <29E76BE6-32D9-45AD-85A1-791DAADDE520@ifi.uio.no>
To: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mail.fit.nokia.com); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:44:54 +0200 (EET)
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: tmrg <tmrg-interest@icsi.berkeley.edu>, Mike Belshe <mbelshe@google.com>, Matt Mathis <mattmathis@google.com>, tcpm <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Increasing the Initial Window - Notes
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:44:38 -0000

Hi,

we currently seem to be a bit stuck. The Google folks have gathered a lot of data, but at the moment it's still not quite clear - to me at least - what data-based argument would convince the WG to either permit IW10 and under what considerations, or which argument would convince us to not do it.

I talked to a few folks after the meeting and made this suggestion:

* Google makes the raw data available. Yoshifumi requested this at the mike, and Jerry said he'd see if this was possible.

* We plan a TCPM interim in a few months, with the only topic being IW10.

* Folks (other than Google) who like IW10 crunch down the raw Google data in an attempt to provide a convincing argument to allow it, and under which conditions. (Obviously, folks can also generate their own data, if they like.)

* Folks sceptical about IW10 crunch down the Google data in an attempt to find problematic cases that'd make the WG lean against IW10. (Obviously, folks can also generate their own data, if they like.)

* We hold the interim with these folks presenting, and see what shakes out.

The idea here is that we really need a more diverse set of folks playing with IW10. Thoughts?

Lars