IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Trial chat services: matrix and zulip

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 06 October 2020 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892773A1446; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wHpL0pT1jNhF; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B3443A0F12; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F87389C4; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 20:43:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id vPtv41E_h5z5; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 20:43:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C15389C2; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 20:43:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DF36A; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 20:38:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DF590F96-32EB-46E4-81BB-9A79CC15CC3A@ietf.org>
References: <3817345c-e25f-ec82-47af-5216a6234560@nostrum.com> <6BFA5C6F-E743-44CB-8F99-6FCDC6F04DC5@fugue.com> <021f6ab0-57c1-1b8d-9942-81f205f5bf81@matrix.org> <3596d0ad-09a8-f0e5-4cb7-f3d00d56c626@gmx.de> <842400f7-479d-af0b-3eee-8ad874480ebd@matrix.org> <CAKHUCzwXiEVHsJvPj8N0nSrm+6n8-C8o-uKGQvuziu8TWOv7OA@mail.gmail.com> <DF590F96-32EB-46E4-81BB-9A79CC15CC3A@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 20:38:36 -0400
Message-ID: <859.1601944716@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Jce73Ox6QJnlu1PGrTvaYWJ7Y3I>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Trial chat services: matrix and zulip
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:38:42 -0000

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
    > I proposed the addition of user accounts a few months ago to the IESG
    > and the Tools Team in order to address the feedback from the IETF 107
    > post-meeting survey, and the main concern expressed was that they would
    > appear to be "official" jabber accounts and therefore representative of
    > the IETF.  By contrast the zulip and matrix instances are specifically
    > named as trials and therefore do not incur that risk.

Unless they weren't @ietf.org.
I'm sure this community has a few under utilized domains that could be used.
I think I'd even offer ox.org.

    > As that proposal was being considered, the community introduced the
    > IETF Slack space and there were discussions in the SHMOO WG about this
    > whole area.  In that context it did not seem appropriate to make such a
    > change as that might be seen as acting inconsistently with the emerging
    > community process.

    > I would be interested in views on this.

Even if we think Matrix or Tulip is so awesome that we'd want to run it
tomorrow, we probably want to host accounts on some domain.   So we run into
the same concern.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email