Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] Proposed survey on I-D authoring tools

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 01 October 2020 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7383A1122; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZ4xfpSL4Rde; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D35283A1120; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1kO1rK-000867-9s; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 16:55:10 +0000
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 09:55:09 -0700
Message-ID: <m2a6x5ophu.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Cc: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Tools Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhbNZB89TTGeV_OTPU8Z4T4bJ7Auw+C-raqY7JnT-WCxQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <71CCD4C4-2CBA-4AD3-A254-2F19B261D882@ietf.org> <m2lfgqq2ww.wl-randy@psg.com> <1071F4D3-3F36-4012-9CBB-19DDDE6D0564@ietf.org> <m2h7req25a.wl-randy@psg.com> <9F1ABBE7-DC90-4C3C-8493-E89243C73C4C@ietf.org> <m24knepwg4.wl-randy@psg.com> <A62BA403-01EC-4142-A91C-6E675C1E1942@ietf.org> <19017.1601561002@localhost> <m2h7rendtv.wl-randy@psg.com> <DBCBE873-ACFA-423D-8ABF-9D4DEBF1AFAB@ietf.org> <CAMm+LwhbNZB89TTGeV_OTPU8Z4T4bJ7Auw+C-raqY7JnT-WCxQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/N4P24os5Ji2-qY8Mknhf_CuqyOY>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] Proposed survey on I-D authoring tools
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 16:55:15 -0000

> I am not so sure what the value of asking what people do today is. The
> question that really matters is what people would do if they knew what
> all the options were.

actually, i don't really buy this.  what i use today differs from what i
use 10 or 20 years ago, and i presume similarly going forward.

what we have today, is close to a classic hourglass model, with an xml
waist.  you can produce that however the heck you want.  and there seems
to be a rich set of tools to produce the xml.  this seems a healthy
ecosystem to me.

and from the xml, the rfced can produce all the output formats.

some really sharp and hard-working folk have produced a rich ecosystem
of front ends.  this is great, as long as they are compatible with the
back end.

and we have a back end which is settling in from a major change.  i
suspect we may not want to 'fix' it right now.

hence my asking what all this is about.  i am trying to produce work,
not chase this week's fashion in editing/formatting.

randy