Re: [Tools-discuss] Proposal to discontinue live mp3 audio streams at IETF meetings

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Thu, 01 October 2020 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BB93A097D for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bangj.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UixbNBJK6bpJ for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAA013A0983 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.10.196] (mta-107-13-246-59.nc.rr.com [107.13.246.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5080E1D63A; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 18:02:13 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bangj.com; s=201907; t=1601589733; bh=BVAwJq5YbbTLc1x1A/u6TPmsYcypHgS1OXqaQUsH/HM=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=LV+urULzLZjAz9UmYX55pdwt9wwJAPMIawVzON/HHZI/7cgJRfgM3LfxziYZyaEA9 3VF+HdMo17+HWOkXdD9C6/MaPzF4DAKF/GRXtIZJcI41ncT7S40sV3CkP6E8QunCfA oqLQ7fTnTWs432Xfs8nfqZjxr7xqvOErVmkaXeJLlRjV1/zbc8jHc7LiWOdQenbozN MyIwLNhs8H/JazkV1bYh8keQJ8kUv1RJSuQfdn0j0foL8m0EnoDOa//DCKLrWWKpWP hgJQAJcLIpkr/ARiwT8mIFqrGKgz2DUi3ouoFpNtUdfrwPRZYFODf2nrsYTlRtEb4X k9w6iuJNxXT9g==
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Message-Id: <BA09FFF8-0AAE-4F66-BCF0-952A7733DBD0@bangj.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FA1FEF6D-1CA1-4C45-A137-85245F2E39A6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 18:02:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <FD7A3960-4F24-46A5-890C-D49DAECF21E9@bangj.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <5a8ed7f4-b0a0-a5ab-5c81-a7af404e9d10@nostrum.com> <21861.1601569998@localhost> <062d3200-418d-151e-c78b-e6c22a6656c5@nostrum.com> <13704.1601584581@localhost> <FD7A3960-4F24-46A5-890C-D49DAECF21E9@bangj.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/sEnIT22e5SPnZCTWelsB7lVZgE4>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Proposal to discontinue live mp3 audio streams at IETF meetings
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 22:02:18 -0000


> On Oct 1, 2020, at 5:41 PM, Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Not only do I not want this to go away, I want all of the material to be available in open formats. This includes:
> 
> 1. audio (presenter in one channel, audience mics in another channel would be even better)
> 2. slide video
> 3. speaker video
> 4. slide files

Actually, even better would be an audio channel per microphone. I’ve been doing machine learning on these audio files and when people speak over each other, it’s hard to do silence detection and word recognition correctly. Having a channel per mic would be so helpful.

Tom