Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Proposal to discontinue live mp3 audio streams at IETF meetings

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Wed, 07 October 2020 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971B63A0EB4; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bangj.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7orkZuqtO2r5; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E97C3A0EBD; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.10.196] (mta-107-13-246-59.nc.rr.com [107.13.246.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0500D1DD2F; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:52:23 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bangj.com; s=201907; t=1602085944; bh=AR3am5fd4ZUji5LzJ+QrvkeDXDMuEAXkMVSHbbH4zO8=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=Q2rbu6eSE7AnDs70XE9wNGlhlXnkIh5oUDTNT6S3J6ur4Msn0g9FfOxWguaAgJCaU fCDFYR5kG41U18cu+S/OJJU92CkSlUzzAITDED5jv5F1/tZuy0Eo7mtiFMX7N9K7zp U18K4j3l/kj+zQxrjb4pYC+MFht+lnMGdo7THH0xu+Sjp4VQeaPng9w5eSEAkazN0M JIJPwek9u5W6cBOXw5ViBlnh/g+toOyC6/Npxyp8tUjllUzBfA4RTVkl1y32R3t1U8 FiAwyxnE1KRWnWPaqKd/2c0ab+k81kCIoStDZAwVv2VkL1i8LFUjUuEOxoepwIlLEL jAGZ/vnG/WOlw==
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Message-Id: <622776EA-0F69-4B28-9CD2-D099EBB8D1DD@bangj.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0D0DF491-08BC-43AA-B200-DCEB80FD8529"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:52:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <c2b71e2f-7f1d-b2f9-ace4-73a82dc30e01@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Tools Discussion <Tools-discuss@ietf.org>, manycouches@ietf.org
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <137438FD-E3FC-40C3-B482-B0E555F5318B@tzi.org> <CA9F75B2-2709-4619-8E64-845F1DFC826C@bangj.com> <743e6bef-ba4b-db2f-1980-62f967560924@nostrum.com> <c2b71e2f-7f1d-b2f9-ace4-73a82dc30e01@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/xQIW_Z97hvLv9D1kyyr9r0TxD9U>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Proposal to discontinue live mp3 audio streams at IETF meetings
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:52:54 -0000

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 5:20 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I would also think about the following: if the one stream per room is a
> hardware problem, is that problem related to the use of old mixing
> stations?  I remember having seen at room back in f2f ietf meetings some
> mixing stations with these numerous linear potentiometers.  These are
> outdated tools.
> 
> Nowadays people use PCs with large screens and virtual potentiometers.
> These dont have limitations in terms of numbers of channels.  There is
> programmatical freedom in the way channels are defined, used and sent
> around.
> 
> If a limitation is in hardware, there is advantage to be gained from
> migrating to software functionality.
> 
> (I might be trying to persuade the already convinced here, but I wanted
> to say that, because it is strange to hear about hardware limitations in
> audio, with 110V/220V nearby and all space and coffee).
> 
> Alex

The physical audio hardware is more of a limitation of the space. You have rooms with separate sound systems with microphones and speakers for a physical audience. Each stream needs to be tied into the existing room sound system.

You could use a computer in each room to pipe that sound over the network to a central stream server but now we’re just talking about where it’s being served from. My previous description was meant to describe that computer in that room connected to that sound system.

Tom