IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [trill] Should we make draft-mrw-trill-over-ip-01 a WG document?

"Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" <tsenevir@cisco.com> Mon, 14 May 2012 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <tsenevir@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF8D21F860B for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2012 05:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.863
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.863 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.736, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PIs-tvy7KTwR for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2012 05:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C56521F859A for <trill@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 05:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=tsenevir@cisco.com; l=1020; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1336998930; x=1338208530; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to; bh=d9SOxmtHckMPcRw8l6rDJNNsWJj26NHTkyjfElUGfyY=; b=G8wra081mNFGyhVylq38AjQD39RegL65YqwGyaEyxIPjvfijZiOdoD/y TmFtIK9BR6jd5quKEDFSuES+6vaiOlpzWQkYJX0i71zw2ZcmXkQHfD2/q j2e2rqtoeHw7wvbPjZCwugXLAOxK+5E5uRsdJbmTurjcStGfyDCXMDySb M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAMz7sE+rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABEs3OBB4IVAQEBBAEBAQ8BHQo0FwQCAQgRBAEBCwYXAQYBJh8JCAEBBAESCBMHh2sBC5pIn2cEixqFJWMEiGSbcIFpgwk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,584,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="44611039"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2012 12:35:10 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4ECZA9Q021594; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:35:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-214.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.145]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 May 2012 05:35:10 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 05:34:52 -0700
Message-ID: <344037D7CFEFE84E97E9CC1F56C5F4A5011CAF33@xmb-sjc-214.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FADB0E8.1090000@acm.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [trill] Should we make draft-mrw-trill-over-ip-01 a WG document?
Thread-Index: Ac0v14OF2W91gDgpTRy9oRvF6ilJagB9fm5w
References: <4FADB0E8.1090000@acm.org>
From: "Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" <tsenevir@cisco.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>, trill@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 May 2012 12:35:10.0168 (UTC) FILETIME=[004CF580:01CD31CE]
Subject: Re: [trill] Should we make draft-mrw-trill-over-ip-01 a WG document?
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 12:35:31 -0000

I do not think we should rush this document to WG status. We should look
in a bigger picture i.e. what sorts of TRILL interconnects are needed
and then proceed accordingly.

We do not want too many solutions that implement subsets. It is a pain
for vendors and confusion for customers. What we need is a single
comprehensive solution that covers the problem spaces.

My vote is "NO" to move this document to WG status.

-----Original Message-----
From: trill-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Erik Nordmark
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 5:38 PM
To: trill@ietf.org
Subject: [trill] Should we make draft-mrw-trill-over-ip-01 a WG
document?


The document is at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mrw-trill-over-ip/

We've discussed this document in WG meetings and on the list in the
past.

Please send comments to the list.

    Erik
_______________________________________________
trill mailing list
trill@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email