IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [trill] Should we make draft-mrw-trill-over-ip-01 a WG document?

Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com> Mon, 14 May 2012 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1735911E808A for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7GYs96T9cDSZ for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5ED11E8087 for <trill@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eaaq13 with SMTP id q13so452085eaa.31 for <trill@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CVcuvDtszXYhQq42rRoqOC/lDjlt5V1IWJp8q38wyXA=; b=IRYyMKfcuEU4e8GN5gd4vKuq2EuB9YOtIAq3HVJWS1RluxXv+8/zHaA6XgWkGwfU39 U8XlA46ZfSSluZL7SFVPtKp9z9L4fu7CZHmI0F8f1963XLJWIVSVzWcoAcShU0zyP3Ug H9XhJvCQnBHxF3c58GSyUkhTzEMaznMcL9aVHP1AtjJ9qVhpoilyE19dvN7NnEbLGyQa 6LJoLrYsRTL4wS6GS6u52M+Xarm1Aeg/NqxHnqxqRciRD6LgUzkUOJwf5kgoic9qToA1 D4760vln9X/FUG+TS1Kr3NYMskxv20z7ot+46fc2kuvoNdt8L9GN2tRz+nZ13zllIX8D 57Mg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.99.79 with SMTP id w55mr1683733eef.59.1337017006276; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.34.78 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FADB0E8.1090000@acm.org>
References: <4FADB0E8.1090000@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:36:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFOuuo4rpP0-ONn-SVoOzfU_+2Z_t8HaXd7dq7HJMvTwdEgGxA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] Should we make draft-mrw-trill-over-ip-01 a WG document?
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 17:36:48 -0000

I don't understand the controversy.  TRILL over IP is useful in
several cases which are actually clearly explained in this document.
And in general, the document seems well thought out and well written.

So, I think it should be a WG document.

Radia

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> wrote:
>
> The document is at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mrw-trill-over-ip/
>
> We've discussed this document in WG meetings and on the list in the past.
>
> Please send comments to the list.
>
>   Erik
> _______________________________________________
> trill mailing list
> trill@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email