IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [trill] Should we make draft-mrw-trill-over-ip-01 a WG document?

Russ White <russw@riw.us> Wed, 16 May 2012 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <russw@riw.us>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60DE21F85CF for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.207, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9lgf3lqwq0Zc for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from da31.namelessnet.net (da31.namelessnet.net [74.124.205.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E43F21F85C5 for <trill@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpe-065-190-156-032.nc.res.rr.com ([65.190.156.32] helo=[192.168.100.51]) by da31.namelessnet.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <russw@riw.us>) id 1SUjHE-0002SF-NC for trill@ietf.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 11:48:48 -0700
Message-ID: <4FB3F68F.2030000@riw.us>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:48:47 -0400
From: Russ White <russw@riw.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: trill@ietf.org
References: <4FADB0E8.1090000@acm.org> <CAFOuuo4rpP0-ONn-SVoOzfU_+2Z_t8HaXd7dq7HJMvTwdEgGxA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFOuuo4rpP0-ONn-SVoOzfU_+2Z_t8HaXd7dq7HJMvTwdEgGxA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Seems clean. You should still use an Antivirus Scanner
Subject: Re: [trill] Should we make draft-mrw-trill-over-ip-01 a WG document?
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:48:49 -0000

> I don't understand the controversy.  TRILL over IP is useful in
> several cases which are actually clearly explained in this document.
> And in general, the document seems well thought out and well written.
> 
> So, I think it should be a WG document.

Agreed --I support making this a working group doc.

:-)

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email