Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00

"Antonio M. Moreiras" <moreiras@nic.br> Sun, 11 August 2013 23:47 UTC

Return-Path: <moreiras@nic.br>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A0011E80EE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NtUaqyJqjHmg for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.br (mail.cgi.br [IPv6:2001:12ff:0:4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF1C11E8106 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.200] (unknown [177.81.133.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nic.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DA1920801DA; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 20:41:29 -0300 (BRT)
Message-ID: <52082128.5090503@nic.br>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 20:41:28 -0300
From: "Antonio M. Moreiras" <moreiras@nic.br>
Organization: NIC.br
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <5207D42F.2030302@nic.br> <5207E319.6070601@nic.br> <B66D2D0C-DE6D-49CC-A87A-7C65B5360DB4@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <B66D2D0C-DE6D-49CC-A87A-7C65B5360DB4@delong.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alejandro Acosta <aacosta@rocketmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 23:47:39 -0000

On 11/08/13 19:29, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I support the idea. It might be worth also asking for a ULA Doc slice at the same time.
> I think a /48 is probably sufficient for most ULA examples.
> 
> But I think it would be good to be able to write up ULA examples and training that use
> actual ULA prefixes intended for documentation.

I agree. An organization could generate an ULA prefix specifically to
use in a course, or document. But it could be copied and used in
production environments. This would break the "global uniqueness", and
could lead to other problems. It would be nice to have a specific ULA
documentation prefix.

I would suggest a prefix with the L bit cleared, easy to remember, and
maybe slightly shorter than /48. For example FC00:0:D0C0::/44.

[]s
Moreiras.