Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Wed, 21 August 2013 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B1B11E826F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1WkUjJ-17Ob7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C5E11E83DD for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 87-7-200.lacnic.net.uy (unknown [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:7000:d06a:9ea1:cd0a:5769]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E13A30849A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:35:19 -0300 (UYT)
Message-ID: <5214FA74.5030607@lacnic.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:35:48 -0300
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
Organization: LACNIC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <5207D42F.2030302@nic.br> <5207E319.6070601@nic.br> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B99BA6E@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <20130819123450.GY65295@Space.Net> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B9A9042@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <D023BDCA-C340-4FAE-9F86-9463E980DF3E@delong.com> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230439DF7A74@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B9AE1B1@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B9AE1B1@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:35:48 -0000

On 8/21/13 1:35 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> </chair>
> 
> On Aug 21, 2013, at 6:33 AM, "George, Wes"
> <wesley.george@twcable.com> wrote:
> 
>> The main problem with extending 2001:db8::/32 to a /29, or
>> allocating 2xxx:db8::/xx is that it requires everyone to make
>> changes to their Martian routing and packet filters, unlike
>> pulling something from outside of 2000::/3. I don't view that as
>> "less expensive", at least operationally.
> 
> 
>> Also, if we're talking about your heartburn with a fairly large
>> requested prefix (e.g. a /20 or /27 or whatever), that lends
>> support to the idea of reusing space that otherwise is likely to
>> become the IPv6 version of IPv4 Class E space (e.g. 6bone space,
>> or 0200::) - formerly reserved, now reclaimable, but unusable as
>> "normal" space on account of currently existing filters (and
>> probably some dumb implementation hardcoding of "invalid"
>> space).
> 
> Well, that is how we came up with 10.0.0.0/8; that was the
> ARPANET's allocation. He could include that in the IANA section of
> the 6man draft as another alternative, and come to that conclusion
> in 6man.
> 

	I couldn't find the reference in RFC1918, Is it documented somewhere
else (besides ietf-mailing lists dicussions)?

Regards,
as