IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00

"Antonio M. Moreiras" <moreiras@nic.br> Wed, 14 August 2013 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <moreiras@nic.br>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F87E11E8142 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 02:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i0IJaNQP0LMl for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 02:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.br (mail.cgi.br [IPv6:2001:12ff:0:4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB7A11E811E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 02:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sarierom-2.local (unknown [177.81.133.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nic.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9690208012C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:57:52 -0300 (BRT)
Message-ID: <520B54A0.4040708@nic.br>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:57:52 -0300
From: "Antonio M. Moreiras" <moreiras@nic.br>
Organization: NIC.br
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <5207D42F.2030302@nic.br> <5207E319.6070601@nic.br> <CAD6AjGQz0A30O7iPovHFcdg_-nErJq936CzZ6C4M3vno1i+MbA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOmxzdyxwKDRU=BNFVVerOs-mDnZaqC1bntEc5tW863bemJwVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+z-_EWnxDdPFnzCh4=CQNuVdMggT9ykoEKLrcRY8ZjVR_c3FQ@mail.gmail.com> <18CD1C88-5F15-46BA-A76C-87F9A033E209@delong.com> <520A82D9.2030602@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1308132111470.12215@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1308132111470.12215@localhost.localdomain>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:58:03 -0000

On 13/08/13 19:20, Azael Fernandez Alcantara wrote:
> I also agree with the fact that re-using the 3FFE::/16 prefix, for
> documentation purposes, would not harm newbies and veterans, because it
> is already filtered and an update of the RFCs refering to it would have
> to be done (RFC 3701).

I can't see any drawbacks. I think it would be a good choice.

Moreiras.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email