Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Thu, 15 August 2013 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D8421E80FA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TVcnifoFlWee for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FE921E80F9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.32.177] (adsl-69-228-94-30.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [69.228.94.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r7F0YiAP022694 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:35:20 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 owen.delong.com r7F0YiAP022694
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1376526922; bh=JWWI0/0+BieVZSizieU+vtB6eOk=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=50hY8p1410khlahajVAAu4Ax3JdrYk3BqqpwxiINIzwViT5kwycAdHL0mFHD5fZ/a bCwed0kehD/D9gNNIXXS54AP6XOEQsDXKcyfkSbPQ6uHRG8EaRCG60RFV7M5tR48jT jQydP5s2tclbf4Nz9dF80ipbHUfC/IkYfhMEvkAA=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B997A52@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:34:47 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A5FDAEA7-BCDD-49A7-897E-7F9FE5C14AB2@delong.com>
References: <5207D42F.2030302@nic.br> <5207E319.6070601@nic.br> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B97DA03@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CA+z-_EWFAGFqyo3E3LzrEhpMRV6axdLJTC50BNwXMNGuJtZuTA@mail.gmail.com> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230439ABEFA4@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <A84D9405-B3D2-4D55-BAEE-FE25ACE45EB6@delong.com> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230439ABF00C@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <7E5164F5-CB38-49D1-94F5-5125FCD2416E@delong.com> <52095DAF.2050505@nic.br> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230439ABF61A@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <4910BB30-FF77-4E69-8B60-E35E5847DB2F@delong.com> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230439ABF936@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B997A52@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
To: Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0rc1 (owen.delong.com [192.159.10.2]); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:37:25 -0000

On Aug 14, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:58 PM, "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com> wrote:
> 
>> [WEG] at the risk of debating bikeshed colors, I would suggest perhaps using :db8:: for both the proposed GUA and ULA doc prefixes so that it serves as a visual cue.
> 
> Hmm. I actually like that color for bike sheds. Reason: if someone ever types that into a configuration, he'll get a statement to the effect that he's an idiot and needs to think harder. An alternative would be to include a non-hex character as in 0GB8::/16

I don't mind the "error message" idea (so long as it can be bypassed for classroom situations, e.g. "no ipv6 doc-prefix-error").

The 0gb8 is problematic for the reasons I outlined earlier.

Owen