IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 17 August 2017 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94029132813 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qOaTZiBOOIa1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3821326E8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id j32so20671516iod.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zFgiaikx57a8+fin2aayqcyc5ADKGFfYWXo2GLdVmcM=; b=SNfD2Qo4g09W9vvP0v5uN2LzswLzkwbmrrY2xwQ0iuanCOhmbdzm9bS1RclXZ+Bf2u T9aGZeijQPZsWwmDLgZ/IPDfXk4SJvHl9RApby2NFw2RwTDz0BmrTRIpdUKVDlBFqP4a NDuYFasf20cYnwstyiSRPBI7uPTE0vUnagftEtwTta78TzAPYH08CTRg7NIgIdY/njH7 ZD2xIgoIdYPTFwU146gwmIDHV6CXhogybK1HDzSdxY4g4mLrnglP04uWDFvLdSau+vM5 vpHbeFMNYhylsUL4gU4arVNSQM8o72yPe60M24J2/S3itLoeYnBQF66XytI5QFF8wE3z DDSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zFgiaikx57a8+fin2aayqcyc5ADKGFfYWXo2GLdVmcM=; b=jqeDN+K3AoRLFEPQNP6T6r8ZMX6ayN4BdU9VutfW4F0pzBEs5RayWySPC4CMc+9kZ6 TVTzDONfnVSa1WDTRbugvurACV5hHLRVFPhSm7vxUmGL22o4PLPrRyazWFRrPdoH5DQB hiwYNeGsOsnLUn7WrIRGnhUik7u5bgP2vaU7Y1hsPnzRTBoSzjmnU0uWW9Eo8Fk3SmdL OQC3K7nR3LPGk66LPQaIn0n37YkJ+hgosSy2Bfz+YRCohS1aGI93v0VBGjrrGbmPlgxf VO76bIfKwoa4hothCwIB//Ue8yEJQHeY7lRrlET0XJxNGZx5whEjYw0BDoxbKwzTaBmF 4Qlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5ggHZoUgHFHs7PH32ZeVoYOYYhgkowWgnlKVvveJA1wL/A00IRs 1c1OJz1EayEqaYbLwE28Vmoi9RVIsrs3
X-Received: by 10.107.201.150 with SMTP id z144mr3682739iof.132.1502956520871; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.27.203 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:54:59 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3aV6sXOkL54a259c1pzuLvNNeYTdyJXA72n3j_0p3p2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: Simon Hobson <linux@thehobsons.co.uk>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0b951a8aabe00556ee55bf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/3_Xb0Scj_9uA3emssVt17DuuB4A>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 07:55:24 -0000

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> I am not aware of any implementation supporting that though. Certainly the
> ones I am involved with do not.
>

The Linux implementation only does SLAAC on 64-bit prefixes. That is the
correct behaviour, since that's what it says in RFC 4291.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email