IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 17 August 2017 09:14 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4D013264C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 02:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IhTs608WvaIe for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 02:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from accordion.employees.org (accordion.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F31DC132386 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 02:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h.hanazo.no (219.103.92.62.static.cust.telenor.com [62.92.103.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by accordion.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 815A22D5037; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:14:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD30FF919D16; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 11:14:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Message-Id: <C7EB1E49-E329-42F9-AEF9-0C301BCCB679@employees.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9CE22E53-76A3-42DC-A79B-A645A7333DE5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 11:14:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: <82CBE1F8-F9A5-463F-8DB1-B92E5A3F6582@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Hobson <linux@thehobsons.co.uk>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com>
References: <CAO42Z2wJBCo1yjguWSy-jzSvndeZTPgtN71FfdEhvqrVAUhZUA@mail.gmail.com> <9bd9f886-f53b-109f-d998-1d4c7adaf3b1@gmail.com> <B6A257C9-7E8A-452D-9C0F-0B10A31990CB@thehobsons.co.uk> <796A0ED0-0F58-43FA-9F81-D4D736A35F3B@steffann.nl> <BD3B4153-2EEF-4BFB-832D-D126A75AEC11@thehobsons.co.uk> <CAN-Dau2jzbQPuE5diEz-XzfRBHY=O1znE8hfy8P-Eee=MVwC_w@mail.gmail.com> <7C6C4FCC-26B9-493D-9992-4663DE6EB9CE@jisc.ac.uk> <3A69468C-98E4-4631-A52F-3D8772646EEE@consulintel.es> <20170807110746.GG45648@Space.Net> <CAO42Z2xXXjKUZ8qQY+b1NgDagX2ZJkqL5gieD+_js59ucp0EMw@mail.gmail.com> <20170810055819.GQ45648@Space.Net> <CAO42Z2xtfsYbw+Wf=ZjyFCmnDbhL17QCkWWRJ7F1+BgGCRiipg@mail.gmail.com> <51268C23-40F4-4476-9025-A1DD3BA37BC3@thehobsons.co.uk> <CAKD1Yr0uBU-LczaZJ5SdNpb_FpB0qfZJ0kNnr=gEviD+F3DTZw@mail.gmail.com> <B13F6A0A-BF0A-404B-A332-5A228F4AFC07@thehobsons.co.uk> <7CB3B027-714C-4F18-8AD9-E76060137891@employees.org> <DCFE724E-B207-4527-82A1-5A268AC29989@gmail.com> <E673D8E0-7A55-490C-8316-77E178026C58@employees.org> <82CBE1F8-F9A5-463F-8DB1-B92E5A3F6582@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/e3AklKFmx-CKIecmkePG19RHjOY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:14:06 -0000

>> Have you read RFC7421?
> 
> Yes, I did. With my own bias, the doc looks quite in the interest of defending one school of thoughts.
> 
>> What problem are you trying to solve?
> 
> Not really. I find it a bit amusing that sometimes logics seem to be overridden under the name of ‘rough consensus’.
> 
> And ‘recommend’ is one thing, and ‘mandate’ is another.

We're here to do engineering. We solve problems. Until we have real problems to solve I think time would be better spent elsewhere...

Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email