[v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt

DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com> Fri, 04 August 2017 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA9A13203F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 18:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H9b-Rc7BlKK9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 18:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x230.google.com (mail-pg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DBF112EB9B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 18:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id v77so1681574pgb.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 18:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:references:to:date; bh=Dywhx+R8FKYp0WqweghgHLaD4TmBgKtTG50O5uZozLc=; b=XJJm6LbWQ7+vQ2r7i/AiwbY2S4vvsUef29ll4OrEi/L2q+Dn7v5XxfizPJwJZ+ZC9T W8+WqhIXfLz36mg1pjEqgQMfx4nAmzOADG0DpkL94fLOsPURarFNG9znAeT/desg+r14 8AUYuMoqW80md0eXzqhwFtOjveOV2ASbjsia47c3fppwpqvvjHIzmtKLXXn8zylCB23M QKUfTzMV7j35iAh0IsiC6y9DmbN1Etxuz5UehtmFDitzu6onTwZ+0hCEB/VLuB5BVUTM SG2RXVGmiRFimhBhNPoG/TGU3yAiYWJnAPYwHo9KtLU6QEUHXgzKJmxraSACcHDFlPgS zo+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:references :to:date; bh=Dywhx+R8FKYp0WqweghgHLaD4TmBgKtTG50O5uZozLc=; b=PbdvrqD5EPIXngCAK3Ci7skJQxWYgBPQtRIjEIEceiXkpSB+rfTlfuBOflXNNtX0Ok ilyN12KpNFCtP5xhYZXm1ihHBDijGb18M5zVVqk7eWMKeZTC29usuLSgrqnjVBz+2agr x2WjKl7yvaFb3c24ZtezXYKjIMms+8PUQ0fIYkAxpQjfVa8RWL9FyjSpR4esM/g3cjZV uwuig6QWPZgU6aB8Z//14N/tcMa8DJnbSqZX2rVd/YWsjJuFBuv+sKxvrGViQK9ligXz rhzG+L0n05p3+fS7aE4BjXzCCicGds0BribXLicFqK1HI3PvRfefi5S8wRkD8Jeh4emW SSYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111tpbp23Uu9+kRyVb28TcUrMDtRn8TqrvdTjmn+dPa64keursSX hIKm1varx6VyQLguWGE=
X-Received: by 10.101.85.79 with SMTP id t15mr659012pgr.95.1501810764878; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 18:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [112.167.24.200] ([112.167.24.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t64sm276540pgd.80.2017.08.03.18.39.23 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Aug 2017 18:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A373228E-2754-49AE-979F-337F0AE696A1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <8737A9C8-F798-4503-99C7-ADBD5B220759@gmail.com>
References: <150148445751.17707.15424999122129322815@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 10:39:21 +0900
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/5imMIVJBbmcJBBQkChpbhJ70Hy0>
Subject: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 01:39:27 -0000

In the 2nd para of Sec. 4, it reads:

"The Unique IPv6 prefix can be derived from a locally managed
   pool or aggregate IPv6 block assigned to the First Hop Provider
   Router or from a centrally allocated pool.”

In the case the prefix is assigned from a centrally allocated pool, does this scenario include the following cases?:

	o all prefixes assigned to devices on the same shared network may not be aggregatable into a single shorter prefix.
	o /64 prefixes may be assigned randomly to different devices on different share network.

---
DY






> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
> Date: 31 July 2017 at 16:00:57 GMT+9
> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations WG of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Unique IPv6 Prefix Per Host
>        Authors         : John Jason Brzozowski
>                          Gunter Van De Velde
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
> 	Pages           : 8
> 	Date            : 2017-07-31
> 
> Abstract:
>   In some IPv6 environments, the need has arisen for hosts to be able
>   to utilize a unique IPv6 prefix, even though the link or media may be
>   shared.  Typically hosts (subscribers) on a shared network, either
>   wired or wireless, such as Ethernet, WiFi, etc., will acquire unique
>   IPv6 addresses from a common IPv6 prefix that is allocated or
>   assigned for use on a specific link.
> 
>   In most deployments today, IPv6 address assignment from a single IPv6
>   prefix on a shared network is done by either using IPv6 stateless
>   address auto-configuration (SLAAC) and/or stateful DHCPv6.  While
>   this is still viable and operates as designed, there are some large
>   scale environments where this concept introduces significant
>   performance challenges and implications, specifically related to IPv6
>   router and neighbor discovery.
> 
>   This document outlines an approach utilising existing IPv6 protocols
>   to allow hosts to be assigned a unique IPv6 prefix (instead of a
>   unique IPv6 address from a shared IPv6 prefix).  Benefits of unique
>   IPv6 prefix over a unique IPv6 address from the service provider
>   include improved subscriber isolation and enhanced subscriber
>   management.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops