IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt

DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com> Fri, 04 August 2017 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA92131CB5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 01:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AJh1BMZGmiqz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 01:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E941124234 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 01:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t86so5506878pfe.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 01:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QVNBigKU0pMeYfPvHBqdzNXuNR/cKnt2Y2yZzTQtFxQ=; b=FLZKzBsmt9QQrDaEflpH6yiyFvkseQB4U54b0W/M3GSfQDhWEGZCmc/pOLaA25q258 lrqOoFuMz8vwjHt5bsFsSVum0p3KZ3ehsmguKERwC3LvLh0PDv15r2G5EPVIqCVNXdA+ fA0EjpKckYPiDroAQms/bAz9srB1KvCNAer+O6q2qhEZev4ZVr2ce9tnBb2isjvOQLEr XNdrEKlhTqmrTk+j6sXLWA58nmclTvahDITFaCi9of5BINrNH60Of/mILz7kBx4HD2zj T2FX9oY1eovBcAfHmExIo8WlHKuYl7YSrHFEhQjkWicS7YjiMdUgI1nIb0ZgcnfgqSqn uOoA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QVNBigKU0pMeYfPvHBqdzNXuNR/cKnt2Y2yZzTQtFxQ=; b=Fgg9/MRdfg49b2qeEJdtYuPzfthcaBukUXVfpobVGhRu0IXQTC24Ly2gpw6F6MbRnl ZBVfXtOC+wtNWtZE1DexcdnMg7d+qap252lpS3EyW9lmyymroT9Akje+VRUo/160tWF/ wOTu9uUGa9FnnVNuAD/EvwCJHXNtGY+S97cQCdGBZdjymaoA1iatCCQfHSuFzcw0iqw3 UWuOmhqTcQk0Sya0rKuXAmzAUTeprtMjW83Oo9qHeY4B0I2PblpR+pZwN95TfUXiYr96 mFG6pNFhBMv5cULQcoP1Ej+0PJf2dCaPRbuF2SHsnWKefWXgWagfDJOTV5hWUF9pcq4C jCiQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112J2ynJsY2fSHXe2up78sNXmgSbZpGqfb5yQ1gr65HhDWl3LJVQ n4SSLcKOXiAeXr4ggcg=
X-Received: by 10.99.114.84 with SMTP id c20mr1539679pgn.13.1501837011679; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 01:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [112.167.24.200] ([112.167.24.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s67sm1738730pfb.100.2017.08.04.01.56.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 01:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708041051180.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 17:56:48 +0900
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8DA09B07-00EE-4132-9125-8FED16582F66@gmail.com>
References: <150148445751.17707.15424999122129322815@ietfa.amsl.com> <2E470571-1620-4527-9489-D4D953000040@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708040512220.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se> <336987B8-56B0-4C59-A9B1-8B91D4D09BD1@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708040927370.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se> <3D12AB07-7CE4-4625-ADDF-5F7CEC8CB115@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708041013350.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se> <0E577FCD-857E-4F2D-947B-D4AA201DE346@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708041051180.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/4zXus5osNAZ7VPmZOcucHgofu3s>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 08:56:53 -0000

OK, I’ll try again.

  o No concept of ‘node prefix’ is mentioned in 4291bis.

  o 'draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host’ talks about ‘node prefix’.

Although 'draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host’ is not meant to change the standard 4291bis, isn’t that in conflict with 4291bis in that the draft uses a notion not defined in the parent standard.

--------
Regards,
DY








> On 4 Aug 2017, at 17:52, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, DY Kim wrote:
> 
>> All mentioned in 4291bis is the subnet prefix, not the node prefix.
> 
> It's impossible for me to follow your comments when you're changing what document you're talking about all the time.
> 
> draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host doesn't propose any change in standards. Agreed?
> 
> So your above comment, what is that about? How does it relate to draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host ?
> 
> -- 
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email