IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt

DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com> Mon, 07 August 2017 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4242213263C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sPQn-SOvL6qD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x243.google.com (mail-pg0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 309E11325D3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x243.google.com with SMTP id y129so735570pgy.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=6bSYNnsU4Eq+vfvJ7GJOuQIvgQVJaGKMlQcBNBmIHaE=; b=TZNssbsHnD0v44F3iBaNWml+xccRtYECMjOJATUR+nrEyTGHkl46R5ux6iN5a0Vmk8 1SaXdj9/rflI0wXZshVMiYsrS8yxBJ1sjkZpCg5WfkMjiIDkit3L8MuBB9z0VfK6dpF0 597RdddTrrOvdVK10lqff1yYg9EFIDHnMF8XhVbdxqWc4rq/hMHZiF9Jl01RMLQQq7Pi Lj26U7hA1c4Yz7cAJiiHEdeLxysk+OXxQbTEZdkVA+eWKX2nEX9A6DL0kdoDJnLcha1D XvuoWMWPht84ZgftsaX8vLkfhmxVF7l3FdfTrZ6/3y4VB/PHm4ScF56b6AdO4Xt6XhMb TnHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=6bSYNnsU4Eq+vfvJ7GJOuQIvgQVJaGKMlQcBNBmIHaE=; b=Z/exoCbYr8CV+yThj35N0uvC0wMq4JmVO+8H9JO7BQB34Uat1/Q6jZ1HmCHyu/WMV1 vl3JohMgm165k2U9k/hO3AypV4HC/MZve7hkXHUxWjDliTuXeoFHm2HJYtvRDnd1zs5Z uwmUQNHmi6JKgE8278V2CWw03wW9WIwLjG735GJRTunyw4Wu2xOZTfxlvqqI0oorQtn0 5906wvflWWKq49fukoeIfKSE1tn/BeeoGGwuIEyGQcOdVEB82fGKSUJl7iJ5r3EYEfzQ qi/ol5nLveZx8UrgdD1pe3ORPlK+nJsuXWh8bLMK5aJ1w1HZY2CctWLQ2JW/V8oI9QVF MKjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5g/A2S5+PaP0WCjPXeMzwxSBZBHbSLx9xO9U5Q5rzusoHjaBTF4 OmtrfaulSYh7mQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.59.193 with SMTP id w62mr1001134pfj.335.1502121635766; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 09:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [112.167.24.200] ([112.167.24.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm12528921pgq.10.2017.08.07.09.00.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Aug 2017 09:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170807130654.GM45648@Space.Net>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 01:00:31 +0900
Cc: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9F44126D-2067-450F-A787-40C981319B22@gmail.com>
References: <796A0ED0-0F58-43FA-9F81-D4D736A35F3B@steffann.nl> <BD3B4153-2EEF-4BFB-832D-D126A75AEC11@thehobsons.co.uk> <CAN-Dau2jzbQPuE5diEz-XzfRBHY=O1znE8hfy8P-Eee=MVwC_w@mail.gmail.com> <7C6C4FCC-26B9-493D-9992-4663DE6EB9CE@jisc.ac.uk> <3A69468C-98E4-4631-A52F-3D8772646EEE@consulintel.es> <20170807110746.GG45648@Space.Net> <DC0AA35C-C5B2-4FF3-B68E-6F70A8B080B5@steffann.nl> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708071323040.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20170807115341.GI45648@Space.Net> <E3859552-2F8C-42E8-B7DF-EAD20F35CFFF@jisc.ac.uk> <20170807130654.GM45648@Space.Net>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pN6za7WYThj4ICxLNxxcYsrfi0Y>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:00:37 -0000

+1.

With a /96, you still have 2^32 addresses to give out to your VMs, virtually the size of the whole Internet IPv4 could accommodate.

A /64 prefix and so 2^64 addresses at your (unsolicited) disposal would be way high and so high even to make yourself guilty of unethical resource consumption.

---
DY


> On 7 Aug 2017, at 22:06, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
> 
> a /96 would be extremely spacious.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email